Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 4982 Del
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2012
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Judgment: 24th August, 2012
+ CO.PET. 279/2012
IN THE MATTER OF AMALGAMATION OF
VINDHYA COAL MOVERS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner/Transferor
Company
with
SURESH KUMAR AND COMPANY
(IMPEX) PVT. LTD. ......Transferee Company
Through Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav,
Adv.
Mr. K.S. Pradhan, Dy. Registrar
(NR), ROC.
Mr.S.M. Hashmi, Adv. for the
applicant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral)
1. This petition has been filed under Section 391 to 394 of the
Companies Act, 1956 by Vindhya Coal Movers Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter
referred to as Transferor Company) and Suresh Kumar and Company
(Impex) Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company)
seeking sanction of their Amalgamation.
2. The registered offices of the Petitioners i.e. Transferor and
Transferee Companies are situated at Delhi, within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
3. Details with regard to the date of incorporation of Transferor and
Transferee Companies, their authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up
capital have been given in the Petition.
4. Copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association as well as
the latest audited Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 st March, 2011
of the Petitioners have also been enclosed with the petition.
5. Copies of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the
Petitioner Companies approving the Scheme of Amalgamation have also
been placed on record.
6. It has been submitted that no proceedings under Sections 235 to
251 of the Companies Act, 1956 is pending against the Petitioner
Companies.
7. So far as the share exchange ratio for amalgamation is concerned,
the Scheme provides that, upon the Scheme finally coming into effect,
the Transferee Company shall issue shares in the following manner:
"17 Equity Shares of Rs. 10/- each, credited as fully paid-up of
the Transferee Company for every 4 Equity Shares of Rs. 100/-
each held in the Transferor Company. Any fractional shares
arising out of the above shall be paid in cash".
8. The Petitioner Companies had earlier filed C.A. (M) No. 91 of
2012 seeking directions of this Court for dispensation/convening of
meetings. Vide Order dated 21st May, 2012, this Court allowed the
Application and dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings
of Equity Shareholders, Secured Creditors and Un-secured Creditors of
the Petitioner Companies.
9. The Petitioners Transferor and Transferee Companies have
thereafter filed the present petition seeking sanction of the Scheme of
Amalgamation. Vide Order dated 31st May, 2012, notice in the petition
was directed to be issued to the Regional Director, Northern Region,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs and the Official Liquidator. Citations
were also directed to be published in "The Financial Express" (English
Edition) and "Dainik Bhaskar" (Hindi Edition). Affidavit of Publication
has been filed by the Petitioners showing compliance regarding
publication in the aforesaid Newspapers on 19th June, 2012. Copies of
the newspaper cuttings, in original, containing the publications have
been filed along with this Affidavit.
10. In response to the notices issued in the petition, Mr. Rakesh
Chandra, learned Regional Director, Northern Region, Ministry of
Corporate Affairs has filed his Affidavit dated 3rd August, 2012. Relying
on Clause 6.1 of the Scheme of Amalgamation, he has stated that, upon
sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation, all the staff/employees of the
Transferor Company shall become employees of the Transferee
Company without any break or interruption in their services upon
sanctioning of the Scheme of Amalgamation by the Hon'ble Court.
11. The Regional Director has raised no objection to the sanction of
the aforesaid Scheme.
12. The Official Liquidator has filed his report dated 21 st August,
2012 stating that the Official Liquidator has not received any complaint
against the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation from any person/party
interested in the Scheme in any manner till the date of filing of the
report and has further stated that the affairs of the Transferor Company
do not appear to have been conducted in a manner prejudicial to the
interest of its member or to public interest as per the second proviso of
Section 394 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956.
13. No objection has been received to the Scheme of Amalgamation
from any other party. Mr. Nikhil Asrani, Director of Transferor
Company, has filed an affidavit dated 21 st August, 2012, confirming that
neither the Petitioner Companies nor their Legal Counsel has received
any objection pursuant to citations published in the newspapers.
14. In view of the approval accorded by the Shareholders and
Creditors of the Petitioner Companies; representation/reports filed by
the Regional Director, Northern Region and Official Liquidator attached
with this Court to the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation, there appears
to be no impediment to the grant of sanction to the Scheme of
Amalgamation. Consequently, sanction is hereby granted to the Scheme
of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act,
1956. The Petitioner Companies will comply with the statutory
requirements in accordance with law. Certified copy of the Order be
filed with the Registrar of Companies within 30 days from the date of
receipt of the same. In terms of the provisions of Sections 391 and 394
of the Companies Act, 1956, and in terms of the Scheme, the whole or
part of the undertaking; the property, rights and powers of the Transferor
Company be transferred to and vest in the Transferee Company without
any further act or deed. Similarly, in terms of the Scheme, all the
liabilities and duties of the Transferor Company be transferred to the
Transferee Company without any further act or deed. It is however,
clarified that this order will not be construed as an order granting
exemption from payment of stamp duty or taxes or any other charges, if
payable in accordance with any law; or permission/compliance with any
other department which may be specifically required under any law.
15. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners states that the Petitioner
Companies would voluntarily deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- in the
Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator within three weeks from
today. The statement is accepted.
16. The Petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order dasti.
INDERMEET KAUR, J AUGUST 24, 2012 rb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!