Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 5536 Del
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) No.7706/2011 & CM No.18262/2011
% Date of Decision: 17.11.2011
Commander N.Rajesh Kumar .... Petitioner
Through Mr.Ravi S.S.Chauhan, Advocate
Versus
UOI & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Ms.Tinu Bajwa & Ms.Sahila Lamba,
Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
CM No.18262/2011
This is an application by the petitioner/applicant seeking to
withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate legal
proceedings as may be available to him under rules and regulations.
Issue notice to the respondents/non-applicants. Ms.Tinu Bajwa,
Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and, on
instructions, states that reply to the application is not to be filed.
For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the
petitioner/applicant is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with
liberty to file such legal proceedings as may be available to the
petitioner in his facts and circumstances.
W.P.(C) No.7706/2011
At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ
petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take such legal
proceedings as may be available to the petitioner in the facts and
circumstances.
All the pending applications are also disposed of.
Dasti.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
NOVEMBER 17, 2011.
vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!