Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R K Swamy Bbdo Private Ltd vs M/S Ultra Motor India Pvt Ltd
2011 Latest Caselaw 2763 Del

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 2763 Del
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2011

Delhi High Court
R K Swamy Bbdo Private Ltd vs M/S Ultra Motor India Pvt Ltd on 23 May, 2011
Author: V. K. Jain
         THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%                     Judgment Pronounced on: 23.05.2011

+           CS(OS) No. 1942/2010


R K SWAMY BBDO PRIVATE LTD                      .....Plaintiff

                             - versus -

M/S ULTRA MOTOR INDIA PVT LTD                   ....Defendant

Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Plaintiff:      Mr. I.C.Kumar, Adv.
For the Defendant:      None.

CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may
   be allowed to see the judgment?                          No

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?                   No

3. Whether the judgment should be reported                  No
   in Digest?

V.K. JAIN, J. (ORAL)

IA 17783/2010 (O.37 R.5 CPC)

This is an application filed by the defendant for

leave to contest the suit.

Since no one is present for the defendant at 3.11

PM, the application is dismissed in default.

The application stands disposed of accordingly.

CS(OS) 1942/2010

1. This is a suit under Order 37 Rule 2 of the Code of

Civil Procedure. The plaintiff company is engaged in the

business of rendering services in the area of Media Direction

for developing media strategies, media planning and buying

media space, execution, operation and release of

advertisements on behalf of its clients in Press, TV, Radio,

Films etc. The defendant vide its letter dated 02.01.2009

appointed M/s. Media Direction, a unit of the plaintiff

company, as its Media Agency on Record for a period of one

year and entered into an agreement dated 11.05.2009

specifying the scope of work and services to be provided by

the plaintiff company. The defendant issued various orders

to the plaintiff for release of their advertisements. The

plaintiff company raised bills for a total sum of

Rs.70,36,711/- out of which the defendant paid a sum of

Rs.48,05,012/-, leaving a balance amount of

Rs.22,29,889/-. It is alleged that the media bills have been

paid by the plaintiff because had it not made payment, it

would have been deprived of the status and privileged of a

Accredited Advertising Agency. The defendant also issued a

balance confirmation dated 31.05.2010 admitting therein

that they are liable to pay a sum of Rs.21,90,543/- to the

plaintiff company. The liability has been reduced from

Rs.22,29,889/- to Rs.21,90,543/- since the defendant

issued TDS certificates worth Rs.39,346/-. The plaintiff has

now claimed the aforesaid amount of Rs.21,90,543/- along

with interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum

amounting to Rs.5,96,964/-, which the defendant had

agreed to pay on the outstanding dues.

2. Since the application filed by the defendant for

leave to contest has been dismissed today, the plaintiff has

become entitled to judgment forthwith.

3. In view of the provisions contained in Order 37

Rule 1(2)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff is

entitled to recover a debt or liquidated payment in money,

arising on a written contract, along with interest on that

amount. The plaintiff has placed on record a copy of the

letter dated 02.01.2009, whereby Media Directions were

appointed as the Media Agency of the defendant for a period

of one year. The plaintiff has also filed an agreement dated

11.05.2009 executed between the parties. Vide this

agreement, the defendant appointed Media Directions , a

division of the plaintiff-company as its agency on record for

the purpose of handling the assigned media and media

related work such as development of media strategies,

media planning and buying and execution and operations of

various advertising campaigns in respect of the all

products/services manufactured and sold/rendered by it.

The relevant clauses of the agreement, inter alia, provide as

under:

"BILLING PROCEDURE AND TIME FOR PAYMENT

All the media costs along with the 3% fee pertaining to the MEDIA AGENCY as aforesaid, will be billed by MEDIA AGENCY on CLIENT from time to time. The bills are payable by CLIENT to MEDIA AGENCY strictly according to the schedule indicated below:

Press Advertising Within 30 days from the date of our bill/invoice

TV Advertising Within 30 days from the date of our bill/invoice

Radio Advertising Within 30 days from the date of our bill/invoice

Film/Internet Advertising Within 30 days from the date of our bill/invoice

Outdoor Advertising Within 30 days from the date of

our bill/invoice or subject to terms of contract with concessionaires

xxxx....In case of a delay in payment to the MEDIA AGENCY from the CLIENT, beyond the stipulated credit period, the outstanding amount will attract interest of 1.5% per month."

The plaintiff has also placed on record the

purchase orders, issued to it by the defendant-company

from time to time and the invoices raised by it on the

plaintiff. The plaintiff-company has also filed the Balance

Confirmation Form dated 31st May, 2010, whereby the

defendant confirmed that an unpaid balance of Rs

21,90,453/- was due from it to the plaintiff-company as on

31st March, 2010.

4. In view of the averments made in the plaint,

coupled with the above-referred documents filed by the

plaintiff company, it is entitled to recover a sum of

Rs.21,90,543/- from the defendant company as the

principal sum. A perusal of the Agreement dated 11.05.2009

would also show that the defendant had agreed to pay an

interest at the rate of 18% per annum on the outstanding

payment. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of

Rs.21,90,543/-.

For the reasons given in the preceding paragraphs, a

decree for recovery of Rs.27,87,507/- with costs and

pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 12% per

annum is hereby passed in favour of the plaintiff and

against the defendant.

Decree sheet be drawn accordingly.

(V.K. JAIN) JUDGE

MAY 23, 2011 sn/bg

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter