Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1840 Del
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No.13296/2005
% Date of Decision: 29.03.2011
VIJAY KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through : None.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .... Respondent
Through : None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed
to see the judgment ? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? No
ANIL KUMAR, J.
The petitioner who was working as part time sweeper with the
respondent-school from 01.02.1997 was disengaged on 31.10.2002.
The petitioner had raised a plea that he was not a part time
sweeper but his services were engaged as attendant in home science
laboratory.
The plea of the petitioner was repelled by the Tribunal and it was
held that his engagement was dehors the rules and, therefore, the order
terminating his services was in order and did not require any
interference by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had, thus, dismissed the
original application.
No one is present on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default of appearance
of petitioner and his counsel.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
VEENA BIRBAL, J.
MARCH 29, 2011 srb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!