Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 683 Del
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) No.7156/2010
% Date of Decision: 04.02.2011
National Institute of Public Co-operation & Child .... Petitioners
Development & Anr.
Through Mr.H.D.Sharma & Mr.J.K.Sharma,
Advocates.
Versus
Smt.Darshan & Anr. .... Respondents
Through Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate for
respondent No.1.
Mr.Yashish Chandra, Advocate for
respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that pursuant to the
notice to Sh.Hans Raj, objections have been filed by him.
Learned counsel for the petitioners also wants to justify the stand
of the petitioners on the basis of the objections filed by Sh.Hans Raj,
which were not considered by the Tribunal as the objections were not
before the tribunal. The learned counsel wants to rely on the pleas and
contentions of said respondent No.2. This Court cannot consider these
objections/pleas and contentions of respondent No.2 unless they are
considered by the Tribunal.
In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to
withdraw the petition with liberty to seek review of impugned order also
on the basis of objections which have been taken by Sh.Hans Raj, the
direct recruit as library attendant.
In the circumstances the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for.
All the pending applications are also disposed of.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
FEBRUARY 04, 2011 VEENA BIRBAL, J. vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!