Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gajinder Yadav vs M/S Subhiksha Trading Services ...
2011 Latest Caselaw 681 Del

Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 681 Del
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2011

Delhi High Court
Gajinder Yadav vs M/S Subhiksha Trading Services ... on 4 February, 2011
Author: Sunil Gaur
*                    HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

                   Judgment reserved on: January 20, 2011
                 Judgment pronounced on: February 04, 2011

+                          C.S. (OS) No. 2004/2009

%       Gajinder Yadav                               ...           Plaintiff
                           Through:      Mr. Rajesh Yadav &
                                         Ms. Ruchira, Advocates.

                                      versus

        M/S Subhiksha Trading Services Limited       ...          Defendant
                         Through:    None.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

1.         Whether the Reporters of local
           papers may be allowed to see the
           judgment?

2.         To be referred to Reporter or not?              No.

3.         Whether the judgment should be
           reported in the Digest?

SUNIL GAUR, J.

1. Recovery of possession of suit premises No.72 & 73, in Khasra

no.53, situated in Lal Dora of Village Nangli Poona, Delhi-36 as delineated

in red colour in the site plan annexed to the plaint, from the Defendant is

sought as the lease of the suit premises stood determined by efflux of time

on 14th November 2008. As per the unregistered Lease Agreement of 4th

November 2005, the monthly rental payable was Rs.1,78,000/- per month.

A supplemental Lease Agreement of 1st October 2007 was entered into

between the parties, regarding enhancement of Rs.26,000/- per month in

the existing rental with effect from 1st October 2007, that is to say, the total

C.S. (OS) No. 2004/2009 Page 1 rent of the suit premises thus became Rs.2,04,000/- per month with effect

from 1st October 2007 till 14th November 2008 in terms of the supplemental

Lease Agreement of 1st October 2007. Interest free security deposit of

Rs.7,12,000/- was also made by the Defendant which was to be refunded

upon vacation of the suit premises but subject to all adjustments.

Pertinently, electricity and water charges were not included in the aforesaid

rental. Though the tenancy/lease in question stood expired by efflux of

time on 14th November 2008, and despite notice, the Defendant did not

vacate the suit premises and was in arrears of rent with effect from

October 2008, till the filing of this suit. Therefore, arrears of rent of

Rs.28,15,200/- are also sought to be recovered from Defendant. Since the

possession of the suit premises has not been surrendered by the

Defendant to the Plaintiff, therefore, mesne profits with interest has been

also claimed in this suit.

2. It is evident from the order of 29th July 2010 that Defendant was

served through publication, but had not appeared in this matter, and was

accordingly set ex-parte on 30th August 2010. Even the notice was affixed

at the front door of the suit premises on 3rd September 2009, and the

photograph evidencing it has been placed on record.

3. In the ex-parte evidence, Plaintiff has deposed in support of the

aforesaid averments made in the plaint and has proved the site plan

(Ex.PW-1/1) of the suit premises; the Lease Agreement of 4th November

2005 (Ex. PW-1/2), supplemental Lease Agreement of 1st October 2007

(Ex. PW-1/3) in respect of the suit premises. Notice (Ex.PW-1/4) sent by

C.S. (OS) No. 2004/2009 Page 2 postal receipt (Ex.PW-1/5 & Ex.PW-1/6) was received back with the

remarks 'shifted'.

4. Upon hearing, learned counsel for the Plaintiff and on perusal of the

unrebutted evidence on record, I find that the Plaintiff is entitled not only to

the possession of the suit premises but even to the arrears of rent

amounting to Rs.28,15,200/- with interest @ 8% per annum from the date

of filing of this suit, till realization. Since the possession of the suit

premises has not been surrendered by the Defendant to the Plaintiff,

therefore, the Defendant is liable to pay the damages, which are granted at

the last payable rent of Rs.2,34,600/-per month, as per the Lease

Agreement of 4th November 2005, from the date of filing of the suit till

date. Plaintiff shall be entitled to the aforesaid amount after adjusting

Interest Free Security Deposit of Rs.7,12,000/- and upon payment of the

requisite Court fee on the recoverable damages.

5. Consequently, this suit for possession of suit premises, recovery of

arrears of rent and damages is decreed with costs against the Defendant

in the aforesaid terms. Decree sheet be drawn forthwith.

6. This suit is accordingly disposed of.

Sunil Gaur, J.

February 04, 2011
pkb




C.S. (OS) No. 2004/2009                                                    Page 3
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter