Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 3984 Del
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ WP(C) Nos.23040-41/2005
% Date of Decision: 16.08.2011
Delhi, Andman Nicobar Island .... Petitioners
Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu Dadra and
Nagar Haveli Civil Services Association &
Anr.
Through Mr.Sanjay Jain, Sr.Advocate with
Ms.Prabhasahay Kaur, Advocate
Sh.Kuldeep Gangar, General Secretary
of Petitioner No.1, Association
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. .... Respondents
Through Mr.Rajesh Katyal, Advocate for
respondent Nos.2 & 3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA
1. Whether reporters of Local papers NO
may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
* After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners, on
instructions from Sh.Kuldeep Gangar, General Secretary of Petitioner
No.1, Association, contends that certain documents of the
respondents which are necessary for adjudication of the present
controversy between the parties have not been produced.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks to
withdraw the writ petition with liberty to seek the review of impugned
order on the basis of the documents which have not been filed, the
production of those documents the petitioner shall seek in
accordance with law before the Tribunal.
Learned counsel also states that this will be without prejudice
to the pleas and contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners in the
present writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed for. All the pending applications are also disposed of.
Dasti.
ANIL KUMAR, J.
SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.
August 16, 2011.
vk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!