Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 4580 Del
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2010
#12,11
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 1483/2010
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate
versus
INDIAN OIL PANIPAT POWER CONSORTIUM LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: None
AND
+ ITA 1482/2010
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate
versus
INDIAN OIL PANIPAT POWER CONSORTIUM LTD.
..... Respondent Through: None
% Date of Decision: 28th September, 2010
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No
MANMOHAN, J
1. Present appeals have been filed under Section 260A of Income
Tax Act, 1961 (in short „the Act‟) challenging the common order dated
29th September, 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in
short "Tribunal") in ITA Nos. 3366/Del/2009 and 3367/Del/2009, for
the Assessment Years 2001-02 and 2002-03 respectively.
2. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, learned counsel for Revenue fairly
submitted at the Bar that the present two appeals pertain to imposition
of penalty under Section 271(1)(C) of the Act and the quantum appeals
with regard to these assessment years have already been dismissed by
this Court vide order dated 26th February, 2009 in ITA Nos. 1156 &
1157/2007.
3. Since the quantum appeals have already been dismissed, the
present appeals challenging imposition of penalty have to be and are
accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs.
MANMOHAN, J
CHIEF JUSTICE SEPTEMBER 28, 2010 ng
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!