Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 5011 Del
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2010
34.
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 196/2010
Date of Decision: 29th October, 2010
CHATURANAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED.....
Transferor Company No. 1
NEON PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED...
Transferor Company No. 2
WITH
KAMDHENU ENTERPRISES LIMITED ....Transferee Company
Through Mr. Rajeev K. Goel, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
O R D E R (ORAL)
1. This first motion under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) for sanction of the scheme of arrangement enclosed as Annexure A-6 has been filed by Chaturanan Industries Limited and Neon Properties Private Limited (the transferor company Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) and Kamdhenu Enterprises Limited (the transferee company).
2. Along with the application, the three companies have enclosed copy of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors approving the scheme of arrangement as propounded in Annexure A-6. Along with the application, the two transferor companies and the transferee company have filed their audit report and profit and loss accounts for the year ending 31st March, 2010. The application is duly supported by affidavits in support of the averments made therein.
3. The transferor company No. 1 and the transferee company are public limited listed companies and meeting of their shareholders are required to be held. The transferor company No. 1 and the transferee company have 203 and 778 shareholders respectively as per the list
COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 196/2010 Page 1 enclosed at pages 81 to 84 and 230 to 223 respectively of the present application.
4. Meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company No. 1 and the transferee company will be held on 11th December, 2010 at 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. respectively at the Conference Hall, Rajendra Bhawan, 210, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg, New Delhi-110002. Mr. Y.P. Singh, Advocate (Enrol. No. D-471CR/96, 287, Lawyers Chamber Block-II, Delhi High Court, Mobile No. 9953711028 and Mr. R.S. Rathi, Advocate (C-33/233, Guru Nanakpura, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, Mobile No. 9810868733), who are present in the Court are appointed as Chairman and Alternate Chairman respectively for the said meetings. The Chairman and Alternate Chairman will ensure that the notices to the shareholders are sent under certificate of posting in their presence at the respective post offices. They shall file an affidavit in this Court that the notices under certificate of posting to the shareholders were posted in their presence.
5. The minimum coram for the meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company No. 1 and the transferee company will be 10 in number and 25% in value terms. For the said meetings, notices will be published in the newspapers 'The Statesman' (English) and 'Veer Arjun' (Hindi). The Chairman/Alternate Chairman will file their reports within three weeks from the date of meeting along with the aforesaid affidavit and all papers including the ballot papers. The Chairman/Alternate Chairman will inspect the proxy register at least 24 hours before the meetings are held and take the same in their custody. The Chairman/Alternate Chairman will be paid Rs.40,000/- and Rs.25,000/- (cumulative) respectively for the aforesaid two meetings. The said amount will be equally shared by the transferor company No. 1 and the transferee company.
6. The transferor company No. 1 has stated that it does not have any secured creditor. Certificate issued by O.P. Bagla and Company, Chartered Accountants, is also enclosed stating, inter alia, that they have
COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 196/2010 Page 2 verified the books of accounts of the transferor company No. 1 and have certified upon verification that the said company does not have any secured creditor. The transferor company No. 1 has one unsecured creditor as per the certificate issued by O.P. Bagla and Company, Chartered Accountants and the transferor company No. 1. The said unsecured creditor has given his no objection/consent to the scheme of arrangement vide letter enclosed at pages 89 to 90 of the paper book. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to hold meeting of the unsecured creditor of the transferor company No. 1. The transferor company No. 1 does not have any secured creditor and, therefore, no meeting of the secured creditor is required to be held.
7. The transferor company No. 2 has 16 shareholders as per the list enclosed at pages 133 to 134 of the paper book. The said shareholders have given their consent/no objection certificates, which have been enclosed at pages 135 to 162 of the paper book. In these circumstances, there is no need to have meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company No. 2. The meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company No. 2 is dispensed with.
8. The transferor company No. 2 has no secured and unsecured creditors as per the certificate of O.P. Bagla and Company, Chartered Accounts and certificate issued by the transferor company No. 2. In these circumstances, meeting of the secured and unsecured creditors of the transferor company No. 2 is not required to be held.
9. The transferee company has no secured creditor as per the certificate of O.P. Bagla and Company, Chartered Accountants at page
234. Similar certificate is also issued by the transferee company and is enclosed at page 235. The transferee company has two unsecured creditors as per the certificate issued by O.P. Bagla and Company, Chartered Accountants and the transferee company (pages 236 to 237 of the paper book). The said creditors have given their consent/no objection certificates as per letters enclosed at pages 238 to 241 of the paper book. In these circumstances, it is not necessary to convene meeting of the
COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 196/2010 Page 3 unsecured creditors of the transferee company and the same is dispensed with. As the transferee company does not have any secured creditor, no meeting of the secured creditor is required to be held.
10. It is stated in the application that no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 are pending against the two transferor companies and the transferee company. The share exchange ratio is not being examined at this stage and will be examined at the time of second motion. The Court has not expressed any opinion in this regard at this stage.
The application is disposed of.
DASTI.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
OCTOBER 29, 2010
VKR
COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 196/2010 Page 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!