Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 4725 Del
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2010
UNREPORTABLE
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MAC App. No.667/2010
Date of Decision: October 06, 2010
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant
through Ms. Geetanjali Choudhary, Advocate
versus
NEENA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents
through None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE REKHA SHARMA
1. Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment? No
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the 'Digest'? No
REKHA SHARMA, J. (ORAL)
It is not disputed by learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance
Company that though the Insurance Company has been directed to
pay the awarded amount to the claimants at the first instance, but it
has been given the right to recover the same from the owner and the
driver of the offending vehicle. It is, however, submitted by the
learned counsel that the driver of the offending vehicle was not having
a valid driving licence and as such, even at the first instance, Insurance
Company could not be held liable to pay the awarded amount.
From a perusal of the impugned award of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, dated July 08, 2010, I find that aforesaid contention of
the Insurance Company that the driver was not having a valid driving
licence has been rejected. However, as there was a violation of the
provisions of Section 157(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 on the
part of respondent No.3(b) having not informed the Insurance
Company about the death of the original insured, it has been granted
the right to recover the awarded amount from the legal
representatives of the deceased insured.
In view of the above, there is no merit in the appeal. The same
is dismissed.
REKHA SHARMA, J OCTOBER 06, 2010 ka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!