Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1745 Del
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on : 26.02.2010
% Date of decision :26.03.2010
+ WP (C) No.2140/2007
SUBHASH SAWHNEY ... ... ...PETITIONER
Through : Nemo
-VERSUS-
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... ... ... ... ... RESPONDENTS
Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Renuka Arora and
Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocates for
the DDA.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate
for Land & Building Department,
Govt. of NCT of Delhi and LG of Delhi.
Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC.
Ms.Rachna Shrivastava, Advocate for
Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Mr.B.V.Niren, Mr.Atul Nanda,
Ms.Rameeza Hakeem, Mr.Gaurav
Gupta, Mr.Sumeer Sodhi, Ms.Malika
Gahlot, Ms.Sugandha and Mr.Sanjay
Bhardwaj, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers
may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be No
reported in the Digest?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
For orders, see WP(C) No.1692/2006.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
MARCH 26, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!