Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1316 Del
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2010
1
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.725/2007
Date of Decision: 9th March, 2010
%
RAM MOHAN UPADHYAY ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Nilkanth Kumar, Adv.
versus
KALA DEVI @ KAMLA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Nirmal Singh, Adv.
Mr. Jeet Pathak, Adv. for
Ms. Rajdipa Behura, amicus
curiae.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may NO
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be NO
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Respondent No.1 is present in the Court along with her
brother, Amar Singh and counsel. Respondent No.1 has
received a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- in cash today from the
appellant's brother in full and final settlement of all her
claims against the appellant. Respondent No.1 has signed
the receipt of full and final settlement. The original has been
shown to the Court and the photocopy of the same is taken
on record.
2. The full and final settlement between the appellant and
claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 is taken on record. The
appeal is disposed of as settled.
3. All pending CMs stand disposed of.
4. Claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 against the appellant
stands satisfied in terms of this settlement. However,
claimants/respondents No.1 to 3 shall be at liberty to
execute the award against respondent No.4.
5. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel
for the parties under the signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J
MARCH 09, 2010 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!