Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 1281 Del
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2010
11
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.475/2009
Date of Decision: 8th March, 2010
%
HARBANS LAL DHADRA ..... Appellant
Through : Mr. S.P. Sharma, Adv.
versus
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS .. Respondents
Through : Mr. R.K. Kohli, Adv.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned
Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.34,360/- has been
awarded to him. The appellant seeks enhancement of the
award amount.
2. The accident dated 7th November, 1990 resulted in
grievous injuries to the appellant. The appellant suffered
union compound fracture of both bones of left leg. The
appellant had to undergo bone grafting at Moolchand
Hospital. The permanent disability of the appellant has been
assessed as 10% in respect of left upper and lower limb vide
disability certificate dated 7th March, 2008. The learned
Tribunal has awarded Rs.4,000/- towards expenditure on
treatment, Rs.20,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.2,000/-
towards special diet, Rs.2,000/- towards conveyance and
Rs.6,360/- towards loss of income. The total compensation
awarded is Rs.34,360/-.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the
followings grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-
(i) The compensation for loss of income be
enhanced.
(ii) The compensation for loss of earning capacity be
awarded.
(iii) The compensation for pain and suffering be
enhanced.
(iv) The compensation be awarded for loss of
amenities of life and disfiguration.
(v) The compensation for conveyance be enhanced.
4. The appellant has suffered 10% disability in respect of
left lower and upper limb due to united fracture both bones
left leg with acromio clavicular dislocation left shoulder as
per the disability certificate. The appellant is a self-
employed professional photographer.
5. The appellant is present in the Court and his injuries
have been perused. The appellant's left leg has shortened
and he limps while walking. The learned Tribunal has not
awarded any compensation for loss of earning capacity to
the appellant. The loss of earning capacity of the appellant
is taken to be 10%. The minimum wages at the time of the
accident of the appellant were Rs.1,060/- per month. The
income of the appellant for computation of compensation is
taken to be the average of minimum wages and its double
which comes to Rs.1,590/- [(Rs.1,060 + Rs.2,120)/2] in terms
of the judgment of this Court in the cases of Kanwar Devi
vs. Bansal Roadways, 2008 ACJ 2182, National
Insurance Company Limited vs. Renu Devi III (2008)
ACC 134 and UPSRTC vs. Munni Devi,
MAC.APP.No.310/2007 decided on 28.07.2008. The
appellant was aged 28 years at the time of the accident and
applying the multiplier of 17 and taking 10% of the same, the
loss of earning capacity is computed to be Rs.32,436/-
(Rs.1,590 x 12 x 17 x 10%). The learned Tribunal has
awarded Rs.6,360/- towards loss of income for six months
taking the minimum wages of Rs.1,060/-. However, the
increase in minimum wages due to inflation and rise in price
index has not been taken into consideration in terms of the
aforesaid judgments. Taking the increase in minimum wages
due to inflation and rise in price index, the compensation for
loss of income is computed to be Rs.9,540/- [(Rs.1,060 +
Rs.2,120)/2 x 6].
6. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.20,000/- towards
pain and suffering. No compensation has been awarded for
loss of amenities of life and disfiguration to which the
appellant is entitled to. Considering the injuries suffered by
the appellant and the surgery for bone grafting undergone by
him and the permanent disability suffered, the compensation
for pain and suffering is enhanced from Rs.20,000/- to
Rs.25,000/-. Rs.20,000/- is awarded towards loss of
amenities of life and further Rs.20,000/- is awarded towards
disfiguration.
7. The learned Tribunal has awarded Rs.2,000/- towards
conveyance. In view of the permanent disability suffered by
the appellant due to which he limps while walking and he is
unable to drive the vehicle, the compensation of Rs.2,000/- is
grossly inadequate. The compensation for conveyance is
enhanced from Rs.2,000/- to Rs.20,000/-.
8. The appellant is entitled to total compensation of
Rs.1,32,976/- (Rs.32,436/- towards loss of earning capacity,
Rs.9,540/- towards loss of income during treatment,
Rs.25,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.20,000/- towards
loss of amenities of life, Rs.20,000/- towards disfiguration,
Rs.2,000/- towards special diet, Rs.20,000/- towards
conveyance and Rs.4,000/- towards expenditure on
treatment)
9. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is
enhanced from Rs.34,360/- to Rs.1,32,976/- along with
interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim
petition till the notice of deposit under Order XXI Rule 1 of
the Code of Civil Procedure.
10. The enhanced award amount along with interest be
deposited by respondent No.1 with State Bank of India A/c
Harbans Lal Dhadra, Tis Hazari Court Branch through Mr. H.S.
Rawat, Relationship Manager, Tis Hazari Branch, Tis Hazari
(Mb:09717044322).
11. Upon the aforesaid deposit being made, the State Bank
of India is directed to release 10% of the same to the
appellant by transferring the same to his Saving Bank
Account.
12. The remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit in the
name of the appellant in the following manner:-
(i) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of six months.
(ii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of one year.
(iii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of one and a half years.
(iv) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of two years.
(v) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of two and a half years.
(vi) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of three years.
(vii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of three and a half years.
(viii) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of four years.
(ix) Fixed deposit in respect of 10% of the award
amount for a period of four and a half years.
13. The interest on the aforesaid fixed deposits shall be
paid monthly by automatic credit of interest in the Savings
Account of the appellant.
14. Withdrawal from the aforesaid account shall be
permitted to the appellant after due verification and the
Bank shall issue photo Identity Card to the appellant to
facilitate identity.
15. No cheque book be issued to the appellant without the
permission of this Court.
16. The Bank shall issue Fixed Deposit Pass Book instead of
the FDRs to the appellant and the maturity amount of the
FDRs be automatically credited to the Saving Bank Account
of the beneficiary at the end of the FDR.
17. No loan, advance or withdrawal shall be allowed on the
said fixed deposit receipts without the permission of this
Court.
18. Half yearly statement of account be filed by the Bank in
this Court.
19. On the request of the appellant, the Bank shall transfer
the Savings Account to any other branch according to the
convenience of the appellant.
20. The appellant shall furnish all the relevant documents
for opening of the Saving Bank Account and Fixed Deposit
Account to Mr. H.S. Rawat, Relationship Manager, Tis Hazari
Branch, Tis Hazari (Mb:09717044322).
21. Copy of the order be given dasti to counsel for both the
parties under signatures of the Court Master.
22. Copy of this order be also sent to State Bank of India,
Tis Hazari Branch through Mr. H.S. Rawat, Relationship
Manager, Tis Hazari Branch, Tis Hazari (Mb:09717044322)
under the signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J
MARCH 08, 2010 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!