Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cosmopolitan Estates Pvt Ltd vs Capitol Estates Pvt Ltd
2010 Latest Caselaw 5648 Del

Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 5648 Del
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2010

Delhi High Court
Cosmopolitan Estates Pvt Ltd vs Capitol Estates Pvt Ltd on 10 December, 2010
Author: Sanjiv Khanna
1&2.
*        IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+      COMPANY APPLICATION(M) NOS. 184/2010 & 185/2010

                                     Date of decision: 10th December, 2010


       COSMOPILITAN ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED.......
                                      Transferor Company.
                     AND

       CAPITOL ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED... Transferee Company.
                     Through Ms. Rekha Aggarwal, Advocate for the
                     transferor company.
                     Ms. Vatsala Kak, Advocate for the transferee
                     company.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

                            O R D E R (ORAL)

1. Additional affidavits filed on behalf of Cosmopolitan Estates Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) and Capitol Estates Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company) in Company Application (M) No. 184/2010 and Company Application (M) No. 185/2010 respectively are taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for the transferor company seeks and is granted permission to place on record another affidavit dated 10th December, 2010 executed by Mr. Deepak Manchanda. By this affidavit, Mr. Deepak Manchanda wants to place on record the corrected list of shareholders of the transferor company as on 31 st July, 2010.

2. The transferor company and the transferee company have filed these applications for first motion seeking dispensation of holding of the meeting of the shareholders and creditors in respect of the scheme of amalgamation. The scheme has been enclosed with the applications filed by the transferor company and the transferee company. The transferor company and the transferee company have also filed their Memorandum and Articles of

COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NOS. 184/2010 & 185/2010 Page 1 Association and their last audited balance sheets. In the applications, the applicants have stated the date of incorporation, authorized, issued, subscribed and paid up share capital of the transferor company and the transferee company. Copy of the Resolutions passed by the Board of Directors of the transferor company and the transferee company approving the proposed scheme has also been filed. It is stated in the applications that no proceedings under Sections 235-251 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) are pending against the transferor company and the transferee company.

3. As per Annexure-A-1 filed with the affidavit of Mr. Deepak Manchanda, Director of the transferor company, the transferor company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the transferee company. All shares of the transferor company except ten shares are held by the transferee company. Ten shares of the transferor company are held by Mr. Deepak Manchanda as nominee of the transferee company. No objection certificates/consent of the shareholders have been enclosed with the application. In these circumstances, need and requirement to call for and hold meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company is dispensed with.

4. The transferor company has one creditor as per the additional affidavit filed on 7th December, 2010. The said creditor Euronet Services India Private Limited has given no objection/consent to the proposed scheme of amalgamation. It is, however, stated that the transferee company after the amalgamation shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the lease deed dated 17th March, 2004 and the indemnity bond dated 10th January, 2005 and shall indemnify the Euronet Services India Private Limited. Learned counsel for the transferor company states that they shall file an undertaking/affidavit of the transferor company and the transferee company along with the second motion agreeing to the terms mentioned by Euronet Services India Private Limited. In these circumstances, need and requirement to convene and hold meeting of the creditors of the transferor company is dispensed with.

5. The transferee company has two shareholders as per the list enclosed COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NOS. 184/2010 & 185/2010 Page 2 at page 29 of Company Application (M) No. 185/2010. The said shareholders have given their no objection/consent letters to the proposed scheme of amalgamation. In these circumstances, need and requirement to convene and hold meeting of the shareholders of the transferee company is dispensed with.

6. As per the additional affidavit filed on 18th November, 2010, the transferee company has only one creditor, viz., HDFC Limited. The said creditor has given their no objection/consent to the proposed scheme of amalgamation, which has been enclosed at page 33 of Company Application (M) No. 185/2010. It is, however, stated in this letter that their consent is subject to the condition that the lease deed dated 8th December, 2009 between the transferee company and HDFC Limited will not be affected in any manner whatsoever. The transferor company and the transferee company will file affidavits in this regard along with the second motion. In these circumstances, need and requirement to convene and hold meeting of the creditors of the transferee company is dispensed with.

The applications are disposed of.

DASTI.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

DECEMBER 10, 2010 VKR

COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NOS. 184/2010 & 185/2010 Page 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter