Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sh.S.K. Marwaha vs Airports Authority Of India & ...
2009 Latest Caselaw 320 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 320 Del
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2009

Delhi High Court
Sh.S.K. Marwaha vs Airports Authority Of India & ... on 30 January, 2009
Author: Anil Kumar
*              IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                            CS(OS) No.22/2008

%                      Date of Decision: 30.01.2009

Sh.S.K. Marwaha                                        .... Plaintiff

                      Through Mr.Vivekanand, Advocate

                                 Versus

Airports Authority of India & Others                   .... Defendants

                      Through Mr.S.K. Chandwani, Advocate             with
                              Mr.Satvir Singh, Sr. Manager.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

1.    Whether reporters of Local papers may be                YES
      allowed to see the judgment?
2.    To be referred to the reporter or not?                  NO
3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in              NO
      the Digest?


ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

1. This is a petition under Section 8 and 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940

contending inter alia that petitioner is a sole proprietor of M/s.Marwah

Construction Co. An agreement dated 28th May, 1985 was executed

between the petitioner and International Airport Authority of India

acting through its Executive Engineer (C) APD-I which has been

amalgamated and taken over by Airports Authority of India.

2. The plaintiff has contended that the agreement dated 28th May,

1985 contemplated settlement of all claims and disputes between the

parties by way of arbitration under clause 25 of the agreement. A copy

of agreement dated 28th May, 1985 is filed which is not denied by the

defendants.

3. The plaintiff has also contended that the disputes and differences

arose between the parties relating to subject work in the year 1985 itself

and the plaintiff had sought appointment of arbitration and had filed a

petition under Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 being Suit

No.1396A/1985, which was allowed by this Court by order dated 6th

September, 1985 directing respondents to appoint an arbitrator.

Consequent thereto Brigadier Gobinder Singh was appointed as the sole

Arbitrator by letter dated 4th November, 1985.

4. According to the pleas of the plaintiff, additional claims and

disputes arose between the parties in respect of subject work and

another petition under Section 20 of Arbitration Act, 1940 being Suit

NO.2037A/1986 was filed and additional claims were also referred to

the sole Arbitrator.

5. Because of some disputes, a contempt petition being contempt

Petition No.1/1987 in Suit No.2037 of 1986 was also filed where Shri

K.B. Andley, Advocate, was appointed as an Arbitrator for adjudicating

the original claims and additional claims and they were referred to him.

6. Thereafter there had been proceedings between the parties for

appointment of another arbitrators and arbitrators were appointed who

resigned and ultimately the appointment of Shri K.B. Andley was also

recalled by order dated 28th March, 1985 and the defendants were

directed to appoint another arbitrator. Consequent thereto Shri W.D.

Dandge was appointed as Arbitrator by letter dated 29th February,

1996.

7. On account of alleged misconduct on behalf of the said Arbitrator

another petition for revocation of his authority was field, however, Shri

W.D. Dandge resigned and on his resignation Shri D.A.K. Chari was

appointed as an Arbitrator. Shri D.A.K. Chari also resigned as an

Arbitrator on 10th April, 2003 on his retirement where after Shri K.B.

Rajoia was appointed as a sole arbitrator by letter dated 22nd May, 2003

who also resigned on 27th December, 2004.

8. The assertion of the plaintiff is that after the resignation of Shri

D.A.K. Chari plaintiff has been seeking filling up the vacancy and

various communications have been addressed to the respondents,

however, the arbitrator has not been appointed nor the disputes have

been referred him. The petition has been filed consequent thereto for

appointment of arbitrator and reference of the disputes as detailed in

the list of disputes/claims annexed as Annexure P7 at page 31 of the

documents filed along with the petition.

9. The petitioner has suggested names of three arbitrators including

the name of Shri I.M. Singh, Former Engineer in Chief, PWD, GNCT,

Delhi, C-447, Sheikh Sarai-I, New Delhi-110017.

10. Learned counsel appearing for the defendants, on instructions,

states that defendants have no objection to the appointment of Shri I.M.

Singh, Former Engineer in Chief, PWD, GNCT, Delhi, C-447, Sheikh

Sarai-I, New Delhi-110017, as the sole Arbitrator.

11. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Shri I.M. Singh, Former

Engineer in Chief, PWD, GNCT, Delhi, C-447, Sheikh Sarai-I, New

Delhi-110017, is appointed as the sole Arbitrator and disputes/claims

as detailed in Annexure P7 annexed with the petition are referred to

him. Arbitrator shall give the award in accordance with law within the

time prescribed. Parties are directed to appear before the Arbitrator on

12th February, 2009 at 4.30 PM. A copy of the order be sent to the

Learned Arbitrator forthwith. Copies of the order be also given to the

parties dasti. The petition is disposed of.

JANUARY 30, 2009                                    ANIL KUMAR, J.
'Dev'





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter