Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 5423 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (C.) No.13900/2009
% Date of Decision: 23.12.2009
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ansul with Mr. Anand Nandan,
Advocate.
Versus
SHRI RAGHU RAJ SINGH .... Respondent
Through: Mr. A.K. Behera with Mr. Manjeet Singh,
Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be No
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in No
the Digest?
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
*
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India is directed against the order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the
Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in a batch
of original applications including O.A. No. 1689/2008 filed by Sh.
Raghu Raj Singh, the respondent. By the same order, O.A.
No.1253/2008 titled "Sh. Ram Kishan Vs. Union of India and Ors." was
also allowed, as it was based on identical facts and the issues arising
were also the same.
2. We have dealt with the writ petition preferred by the
petitioner arising out of the common judgment in the case of Sh. Ram
Kishan, as aforesaid, while dealing with W.P. (C) No.13894/2009,
which is also being heard today along with the present writ petition.
We have found no infirmity in the impugned common order dated
20.01.2009 passed by the Tribunal. For the reasons stated in our
order of even date in W.P. (C) No.13894/2009, we dismiss this writ
petition.
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
DECEMBER 23, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. sr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!