Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Union Of India & Ors. vs Shri Raghu Raj Singh
2009 Latest Caselaw 5423 Del

Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 5423 Del
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2009

Delhi High Court
Union Of India & Ors. vs Shri Raghu Raj Singh on 23 December, 2009
Author: Vipin Sanghi
*             IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                          W.P. (C.) No.13900/2009

%                        Date of Decision: 23.12.2009


UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                      .... Petitioners

                         Through: Mr. Ansul with Mr. Anand Nandan,
                                  Advocate.


                                   Versus

SHRI RAGHU RAJ SINGH                                     .... Respondent

                         Through: Mr. A.K. Behera with Mr. Manjeet Singh,
                                  Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

1.    Whether reporters of Local papers may be                No
      allowed to see the judgment?

2.    To be referred to the reporter or not?                  No

3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in              No
      the Digest?


VIPIN SANGHI, J.

*

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India is directed against the order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in a batch

of original applications including O.A. No. 1689/2008 filed by Sh.

Raghu Raj Singh, the respondent. By the same order, O.A.

No.1253/2008 titled "Sh. Ram Kishan Vs. Union of India and Ors." was

also allowed, as it was based on identical facts and the issues arising

were also the same.

2. We have dealt with the writ petition preferred by the

petitioner arising out of the common judgment in the case of Sh. Ram

Kishan, as aforesaid, while dealing with W.P. (C) No.13894/2009,

which is also being heard today along with the present writ petition.

We have found no infirmity in the impugned common order dated

20.01.2009 passed by the Tribunal. For the reasons stated in our

order of even date in W.P. (C) No.13894/2009, we dismiss this writ

petition.

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

DECEMBER 23, 2009                                    ANIL KUMAR, J.

sr





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter