Savitri Kumari vs Muncipal Corporation Of Delhi
2009 Latest Caselaw 3236 Del

37
*      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+      W.P.(C) 10927/2009 & C.M.No.10113/2009

       SAVITRI KUMARI                   ..... Petitioner
                            Through Mr.S.K. Sinha, advocate.

                     versus

       M.C.D.                   ..... Respondent
                            Through Ms.Mansi Gupta, advocate.

       CORAM:
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

                                     ORDER

% 18.08.2009

1. The Petitioner had applied for allotment of dairy plot in Ghogha Dairy

Colony Project vide application dated 1.3.06 by depositing Rs. 1,20,000/-.

2. The respondent/MCD by a public notice dated 24.09.2007 informed the

petitioner that he has not been found running a dairy at the address as

mentioned in the application form and Rs. 1,20,000/- deposited with the

application form stands forfeited.

3. The only question raised in present petition is whether MCD is entitled to

forfeit Rs 1,20,000/-. This issue is covered by the decision dated 08/04/08

passed in W.P. (C) No. 1294/08 titled as Rajni Gupta Vs. MCD and Anr. In the

operative portion of the said judgment it was held:-

"MCD is not entitled to retain the entire sale consideration received and paid by the petitioner. Section 64 of the Contract Act is applicable. The respondent is entitled to deduct the financial expenditure incurred by them on examining the applications, sending committee members for verification well as some punitive demands. MCD is entitled to set off the said amount. Keeping in view facts of the present case, I feel that interest of justice would be met if MCD is allowed to set off Rs 20,000/- for each plot measuring 60 Sq. Mtrs. and Rs 30,000/- for each plot

WPC No.10927/2008 Page 1 measuring 96 Sq. Mtrs towards demands, but the balance amount should be refunded to the petitioners. The amount being forfeited is also punitive in nature and in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Act. Respondent/ MCD will refund the balance amount to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today by crossed cheques. The respondent MCD will write letters by registered post to the petitioners calling upon them to furnish details of their bank account and personally come and collect the cheques. Payment will be made after properly identifying the person who had made the deposit. In case the MCD does not make payment within six weeks from today, it shall be liable to pay interest from the date of the order till payment @ 10% per annum."

4. The said judgment has been upheld by the Division Bench in their

judgment dated 16.12.2008. Special Leave Petition filed by the MCD is

dismissed.

5. The facts of the present case are identical. The writ petition is accordingly

allowed and the respondent/MCD is directed to refund the deposited amount less

the amount permitted to be deducted in terms of the judgment dated 8.4.2008.

The petitioner of course will have to establish and prove the deposit made and

will file photocopy of documents within 15 days. The respondent/MCD will verify

the documents and make payment within 6 weeks after photocopy of documents

is submitted. Failure to make payment within 6 weeks from submission of

documents will attract interest @10% per annum from date of this order till

realization.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

AUGUST 18, 2009.

       P




WPC No.10927/2008                                                                Page 2