Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Wahid Khan & Ors vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi)
2008 Latest Caselaw 1051 Del

Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1051 Del
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2008

Delhi High Court
Wahid Khan & Ors vs State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 16 July, 2008
Author: Anil Kumar
*             IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                          Crl.Rev.P No.876-79/2006

%                          Date of Decision : 16.07.2008


Wahid Khan & Ors                               ....... Petitioners
                Through:           None.


                                     Versus


State (N.C.T. of Delhi)                            ......... Respondent
                   Through :       Mr.Amit Sharma, APP for the State.


CORAM :-
* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

    1. Whether reporters of Local papers may               YES
       be allowed to see the judgment?
    2. To be referred to the reporter or not?              NO
    3. Whether the judgment should be reported             NO
       in the Digest?


ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

No one was present on behalf of petitioner and the matter

was passed over. Even after pass over no one is present.

No one had been present even on 21st November, 2007 and

21st April, 2008.

The entire record has been perused and the arguments

have been heard on behalf of learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner has impugned the order dated 26th October,

2006 dismissing the objections of the petitioner to framing of charge.

While disposing of the objections to framing of charge the Sessions

Court has categorically observed that the plea of self defence or the plea

of alibi are matters of defence which cannot be raised at the stage of

arguments on charge nor such pleas can be considered nor the charge

can be modified on account of the plea of self defence or the plea of

alibi.

Considering the facts and circumstances there is no

illegality or apparent error so as to entail interference by this Court in

the petition filed against the order dated 26th October, 2006 dismissing

the objections of the petitioner to framing of charge. The revision

petition is without any merit and it is, therefore, dismissed.

July 16, 2008                                      ANIL KUMAR, J.
'K'





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter