Citation : 2008 Latest Caselaw 1051 Del
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2008
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Crl.Rev.P No.876-79/2006
% Date of Decision : 16.07.2008
Wahid Khan & Ors ....... Petitioners
Through: None.
Versus
State (N.C.T. of Delhi) ......... Respondent
Through : Mr.Amit Sharma, APP for the State.
CORAM :-
* HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported NO
in the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J.
*
No one was present on behalf of petitioner and the matter
was passed over. Even after pass over no one is present.
No one had been present even on 21st November, 2007 and
21st April, 2008.
The entire record has been perused and the arguments
have been heard on behalf of learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
The petitioner has impugned the order dated 26th October,
2006 dismissing the objections of the petitioner to framing of charge.
While disposing of the objections to framing of charge the Sessions
Court has categorically observed that the plea of self defence or the plea
of alibi are matters of defence which cannot be raised at the stage of
arguments on charge nor such pleas can be considered nor the charge
can be modified on account of the plea of self defence or the plea of
alibi.
Considering the facts and circumstances there is no
illegality or apparent error so as to entail interference by this Court in
the petition filed against the order dated 26th October, 2006 dismissing
the objections of the petitioner to framing of charge. The revision
petition is without any merit and it is, therefore, dismissed.
July 16, 2008 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'K'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!