Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Eurocos Cosmetics Gmbh vs Mr. Kewal Kishore Birwani And Anr.
2007 Latest Caselaw 2065 Del

Citation : 2007 Latest Caselaw 2065 Del
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2007

Delhi High Court
Eurocos Cosmetics Gmbh vs Mr. Kewal Kishore Birwani And Anr. on 30 October, 2007
Author: B D Ahmed
Bench: B D Ahmed

JUDGMENT

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.

1. This is a joint application filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for recording the compromise arrived at between the parties and for decreeing the suit in terms thereof. The plaintiff had instituted the suit seeking injunction against the defendant from infringing and misusing its registered trademarks "HUGO", "HUGO BOSS", "BOSS" and "THE BOSS" and from passing off their goods as the goods of the plaintiff.

2. During the pendency of the suit, the parties have arrived at a settlement / compromise. The defendants have acknowledged the proprietorship of the plaintiff over the aforesaid trademarks. They have also agreed not to use the same or to pass off any of their goods as that of the plaintiff's. They have also agreed not to make any application before the Trademark Registry in respect of the said trademarks. Other terms and conditions have been set out in paragraph 5 of the application. The defendants have also agreed to pay a sum of Rs 25,000/- to the plaintiff as costs of the present suit. The plaintiff has agreed not to press for rendition of accounts and / or other reliefs prayed in the plaint.

3. The application is signed by Mrs Rachna Virmani, who is the proprietor of K. V. International on behalf of the defendant No. 1 and by Mrs Kavita Arora, who is the proprietor of defendant No. 2, on behalf of the defendant No. 2. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the defendant No. 2 is the sister concern of K. V. International. On behalf of the plaintiff the application has been signed by Mr Ralf Gobbers and Dr. Jorn R. Huble, who are the authorized signatories of the plaintiff company. The same is also supported by their affidavits as well as the affidavits of Mrs Kavita Arora and Mrs Rachna Virmani.

4. I have examined the terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties and I am satisfied that the same is lawful. Accordingly, the compromise is taken on record. The application is marked as Ext. C-1. The suit is decreed in terms of prayer A of the plaint. The rest of the prayers, apart from prayer D, are given up by the plaintiff. Insofar as the prayer D is concerned, it has been agreed that the defendant shall pay costs of Rs 25,000/- to the plaintiff. The suit stands decreed accordingly. This application (Ext. C-1) shall form part of the decree. The formal decree be drawn up.

This application, the suit and other pending applications stand disposed of.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter