Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.L. Sahni And Ors. vs R. Singh, Assistant Commissioner ...
2001 Latest Caselaw 742 Del

Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 742 Del
Judgement Date : 21 May, 2001

Delhi High Court
R.L. Sahni And Ors. vs R. Singh, Assistant Commissioner ... on 21 May, 2001
Equivalent citations: (2001) 171 CTR Del 459, 2002 254 ITR 292 Delhi
Author: R Sodhi
Bench: R Sodhi

JUDGMENT

R.S. Sodhi, J.

1. Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 800 of 1991 is filed with a prayer that the proceedings in the complaint case entitled "Ranjan Singh (Asst. CIT) v. Sahni Silk Mills (P.) Ltd. under Section 276CC read with Section 278B pending in the court of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Tis Hazari Courts be quashed.

2. It is contended before me by learned counsel that for the assessment year 1986-87, a return was required to be filed latest by June 30, 1986. However, the return was filed on May 25, 1988, and, therefore, the Department proceeded by filing a complaint initiating prosecution under Section 276CC read with Section 278B. Learned counsel draws my attention to the proviso to Section 276CC where it is mentioned that for any assessment year commencing on or after April 1, 1975, if the tax payable by him on the total income determined on regular assessment, as reduced by the advance tax, if any, paid, and any

tax deducted at source, does not exceed three thousand rupees, prosecution would not be launched. Learned counsel submits that during the pendency of this appeal, the appellate authority has assessed the income as minus Rs. 9,030 and further directed a refund of Rs. 40,642 for the year 1986-87 to the firm, Sahni Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd., 42-A, Friends Colony, New Delhi. In view thereof, he further submits that no proceedings could have been initiated since there is no tax payable much less not exceeding Rs. 3,000. At this time, Mr. Jolly, appears on behalf of the Department. He submits that a week's time be given to him to ascertain whether the appellate order is under challenge before the Tribunal.

3. Having heard learned counsel, I am not inclined to adjourn this matter further. This petition has been pending in this court since April 5, 1991. There is nothing on record to show that the appellate order is under challenge. I am, therefore, satisfied that no complaint, in the given circumstances, could have been filed.

4. Criminal Miscellaneous (Main) No. 800 of 1991 is allowed and the complaint is dismissed.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter