Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjay Rishi vs Union Of India
1998 Latest Caselaw 492 Del

Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 492 Del
Judgement Date : 28 May, 1998

Delhi High Court
Sanjay Rishi vs Union Of India on 28 May, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1999 106 TAXMAN 68 Delhi
Author: R Lahobi

ORDER

R.C. Lahobi, J.

This application has been filed on behalf of both the petitioners seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 30-8-1996 (Annexure 1), passed under section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Subsequently, an order dated 28-2-1997 under section 269UJ of the Act has also been passed. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are abandoning their challenge to these orders and seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 30-8-1996 (Annexure 1), passed under section 269UD(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). Subsequently, an order dated 28-2-1997 under section 269UJ of the Act has also been passed. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are abandoning their challenge to these orders and seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.

3. It is also submitted that in view of the petitioners, having given up the challenge to the orders of the appropriate authority, an amount of Rs. 49,51,496 is liable to be released to the petitioners and as per the agreement arrived at between the two petitioners, the entire amount is to be received by Om Prakash Bhasin, petitioner No. 2.

3. It is also submitted that in view of the petitioners, having given up the challenge to the orders of the appropriate authority, an amount of Rs. 49,51,496 is liable to be released to the petitioners and as per the agreement arrived at between the two petitioners, the entire amount is to be received by Om Prakash Bhasin, petitioner No. 2.

4. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the petition being dismissed as withdrawn.

4. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the petition being dismissed as withdrawn.

5. As prayed by both the petitioners, the amount of Rs. 49,51,496 along with the interest, payable as per law, shall be released to Om Prakash Bhasin, petitioner No. 2, within two weeks. An affidavit shall be filed by Sanjay Rishi, the petitioner No. 1, before the appropriate authority giving consent for the release of the amount to petitioner No. 2 alone and the appropriate authority shall satisfy itself as to the identity of Sanjay Rishi, petitioner No. 1. The affidavit shall be filed within two weeks and the amount shall be released within two weeks of the date of compliance by the petitioners.

5. As prayed by both the petitioners, the amount of Rs. 49,51,496 along with the interest, payable as per law, shall be released to Om Prakash Bhasin, petitioner No. 2, within two weeks. An affidavit shall be filed by Sanjay Rishi, the petitioner No. 1, before the appropriate authority giving consent for the release of the amount to petitioner No. 2 alone and the appropriate authority shall satisfy itself as to the identity of Sanjay Rishi, petitioner No. 1. The affidavit shall be filed within two weeks and the amount shall be released within two weeks of the date of compliance by the petitioners.

6. CM is allowed and CWP is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. CM is allowed and CWP is dismissed as withdrawn.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter