Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jashandeep Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 577 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 577 Chatt
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Jashandeep Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 16 March, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                              1




                                                                                  2026:CGHC:12518
                                                                                            NAFR

                                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                                MCRC No. 1039 of 2026

                      Jashandeep Singh S/o Gurunam Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Nanded
                      Gurudwara,      Langar     Saheb,      District   -   Vajirabad,    Maharastra
                                                                                         ... Applicant


                                                            versus
VAIBHAV
SINGH
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV SINGH         State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kabir
Date: 2026.03.16
17:38:55 +0530

                      Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh                            ... Respondent

For Applicant : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board

16.03.2026

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the

applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.190/2025

registered at Police Station - Kabir Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) for the

offences punishable under Sections 21(B) & 18(B) of the NDPS Act

and Section 111 of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 and 27 of the Arms Act.

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 29.08.2025, acting up-co

secret information, the police of Police Station Kabir Nagar conducted a

search at the residence of accused Rupinder Singh at Veer Savarkar

Nagar, Raipur, and recovered 87.93 grams of heroin, 91 grams of

opium (wrongly mentioned in the order dated 10.11.2025), and

cartridges from his possession and premises. During investigation,

Rupinder Singh disclosed that he, along with his associates, had

brought the contraband from Punjab to Raipur for sale and had

distributed it among his peddlers. The mobile phone data of co-

accused Rupinder Singh allegedly revealed that the applicant, along

with other co-accused persons, was in frequent contact with him and

was one of his subordinate peddlers involved in selling the contraband.

Consequently, the applicant was arrested on 30.08.2025 by the police

of Police Station Kabir Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.), for offences

punishable under Sections 21(b) and 18(b) of the NDPS Act, Section

111 of the BNS, 2023, and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is

innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She

further submits that the said contraband article was not seized from the

possession of the present applicant. She also submits that prosecution

agency has not followed the provisions under Section 42 of the NDPS

Act. She further submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedents

and he has been in jail since 30.08.2025 and conclusion of the trial is

likely to take quite long time. Therefore, she prays for grant of regular

bail to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application

of the present applicant and submit that the charge-sheet has been

filed in the present case before the competent Court and also endorse

the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant. He

further submits that from the possession of the present applicant along

with co-accused 87.93 grams of heroin, 91 grams of opium, and

cartridges was seized, therefore, the present applicant is not entitled

for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the

case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the

nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the present

applicant, and the fact that the co-accused, namely Arbaz Khan, has

already been granted bail vide order dated 05.12.2025 passed in

MCRC No. 9991 of 2025, and further considering that the charge-sheet

has already been filed before the competent Court, that the applicant

has no previous criminal antecedents, and that the applicant has been

in judicial custody since 01.09.2026, and also considering that the

conclusion of the trial is likely to take considerable time, this Court is of

the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the

present case.

7. Let applicant, Jashandeep Singh, involved in Crime No.190/2025

registered at Police Station - Kabir Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) for the

offences punishable under Sections 21(B) & 18(B) of the NDPS Act

and Section 111 of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 and 27 of the Arms Act,

be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties in

the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the

following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial

Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith.

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE

vaibhav

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter