Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B. N. Mishra vs State Of C.G
2026 Latest Caselaw 405 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 405 Chatt
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

B. N. Mishra vs State Of C.G on 12 March, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                          1




                                                                                2026:CGHC:11907
                                                                                          NAFR

                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                             MCRCA No. 261 of 2026
                   B. N. Mishra S/o Late Devnath Mishra Aged About 65 Years R/o House No.
                   896, Kailash Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.)                   ... Applicant


                                                       versus


VAIBHAV
SINGH              State Of C.G. Through Police Station City Kotwali, District Durg (C.G.)
                                                                                   ... Respondent

For Applicant : Mr. Parth kumar Jha, Advocate.

For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board

12.03.2026

1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is

apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.443/2024

registered at Police Station - City Kotwali, District - Durg (C.G.) for the

offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that, the complainant Saraswati Mishra

filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure before the trial Court stating that industrial land had been

allotted on a 99-year lease by the District Industries Centre (DIC),

Durg, in the joint names of her husband Rajkishore Mishra and H.S.

Mishra, each having a 50% share, and the same was duly registered in

the office of the Registrar. After the death of her husband on

27.04.2021, the complainant submitted an application to the DIC along

with all necessary documents on 28.05.2021 and 21.06.2021

requesting that her name be recorded in place of her deceased

husband with the consent of her son Vivek Mishra. However, despite

the said application being pending and despite continuous follow-up,

the concerned officials of DIC allegedly transferred the said land to

another person. Upon obtaining documents through a Right to

Information (RTI) application, the complainant discovered that the

transfer had been made on the basis of forged documents containing

fake signatures of the complainant and her son, allegedly in collusion

with certain individuals including the present applicant B.N. Mishra. It

was alleged that the accused persons conspired with the officials of the

DIC and fraudulently transferred the land allotted to the complainant's

husband by preparing forged documents. The complainant had earlier

lodged complaints before the City Kotwali Police Station, Durg, on

13.10.2022 and before the Superintendent of Police, Durg, on

10.10.2022, but no action was taken. Thereafter, the complainant

approached the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur by filing

WPC No. 4666/2022 and obtained a stay order on the sale of the said

land. Subsequently, the complainant filed an application under Section

156(3) Cr.P.C. before the trial Court, and upon considering the matter,

the Court directed registration of an FIR against the present applicant

B.N. Mishra and others under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of

the Indian Penal Code and further directed the police to conduct

investigation and submit a report before the concerned Court. Pursuant

to the said order, the police of City Kotwali Police Station, Durg

registered a case against the accused under Sections 420, 467, 468

and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and the investigation is presently in

progress.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent

and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. It is further

submitted that the FIR, when examined in the given circumstances,

itself indicates that the prosecution story is prima facie not believable. It

is further submitted that the police have failed to make the main

person, namely Bumbum Mishra, who allegedly impersonated himself

as H.S. Mishra S/o D.N. Mishra, along with other beneficiaries of the

alleged illegal transaction, namely Anish Kumar, Somesh Kumar and

Rajat Kumar, as accused persons, whereas the present applicant has

been implicated despite the fact that he was merely a witness to some

of the documents. It is further contended that the investigation has not

been conducted in a fair manner and the police have wrongly arraigned

the present applicant as an accused while exonerating the actual

beneficiaries of the alleged transaction. The applicant is about 60 years

of age, has a good reputation in society and has no criminal

antecedents. He is a permanent resident of the address mentioned in

the cause title and possesses both movable and immovable properties

there, and therefore there is no likelihood of his absconding or

tampering with the prosecution witnesses.

4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the anticipatory bail

application.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case

diary.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions

of the learned counsel for the parties, the nature of the dispute, and the

material available in the case diary, this Court, without expressing any

opinion on the merits, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

present applicant.

7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is allowed and it is directed that in the

event of arrest of the applicant - B. N. Mishra, on executing a personal

bond and one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the

arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on the following

conditions:-

(a) he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court.

(b) he shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.

(c) he shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial.

(d) the applicant and the surety shall submit a copy of his adhaar card along with a coloured postcard full size photo having printed the adhaar number on it, which shall be verified by the trial Court.

(e) he shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in future.

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE

vaibhav

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter