Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bambam Shah vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 43 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 43 Chatt
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Bambam Shah vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 25 February, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha

2026:CGHC:9856 NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCRC No. 1562 of 2026

Bambam Shah S/o Shyam Prasad Aged About 51 Years R/o Lakshmipur, District- Katihar (Bihar) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P.S. Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : None.

For Non-Applicant/State : Dr. Sourabh Pandey, Deputy Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board Digitally signed by PREETI 25.02.2026 PREETI KUMARI KUMARI Date:

2026.02.25 16:22:50 +0530 1. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application when the

case is called out, however, with the assistance of the learned State

counsel, this Court proceeds to hear and decide this bail application.

2. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail,

as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 242/2025,

registered at Police Station - Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, (C.G.) for the

offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 3(5), 336(3), 336(4), 338 and

340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhit, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution story, in brief, the complainant lodged an FIR

against unknown persons alleging that on 30.06.2025 at about 1:00 PM,

two individuals came to his house. Under the pretext of cleaning utensils

as well as gold and silver items, they fraudulently took gold jewellery

belonging to his sister, Jaya Jain, and fled from the spot. On the basis of

the complaint, a crime under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNS was

registered against the unknown accused, and investigation was initiated.

At the time of the incident, the complainant was away from home. His

younger sister, Jaya Jain, informed him over the phone that at

approximately 1:05 PM, two men came to their house promoting a

product for cleaning and polishing utensils. They were wearing shirts and

pants and stated that they had come to promote their utensil-cleaning

product. They asked to see the household utensils and cleaned the

utensils that were given to them. Thereafter, they stated that they also

clean gold and silver items. Upon hearing this, Jaya Jain gave them three

gold bangles and one gold ring from the house for cleaning. The two men

placed all the gold items inside a tiffin box and asked her to heat the

closed tiffin box. She took the tiffin box to the gas stove and heated it as

instructed. After some time, when she opened the tiffin box, the gold

bangles and ring were missing. When she went outside to look for the two

men, she found that they had fled on a red and black motorcycle. The

approximate value of the stolen gold bangles and ring is Rs.1,50,000/-.

4. It has been pleaded in the bail application that the applicant is innocent

and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant has three

previous criminal antecedents of the similar nature in which he is on bail.

The applicant is in jail since 12.08.2025 and trial is likely to take quite

long time for its conclusion, therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

5. The learned State counsel opposes the bail application of the applicant

and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that

the applicant has three previous criminal antecedents of the similar

nature, hence he is not entitled for grant of bail.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused all of the

documents available on record.

7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the

nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the

fact that the applicant has three previous criminal antecedents of the

similar nature in which he is on bail, and the applicant is in jail since

12.08.2025, the charge-sheet has been filed in this case, and the

conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, this Court is of the view

that the applicant is entitled to be granted regular bail in this case on the

ground of parity.

8. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let applicant -

Bambam Shah, involved in Crime No. 242/2025, registered at Police

Station - Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, (C.G.) for the offence punishable

under Sections 318(4), 3(5), 336(3), 336(4), 338 and 340(2) of Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhit, 2023, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal

bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the

Court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect

that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates

fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in

court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open

for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and

pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial

court on each date fixed, either personally or through her

counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient

cause, the trial court may proceed against her under

Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail

during trial and in order to secure her presence,

proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and

the applicants fails to appear before the court on the

date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall

initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law,

under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person,

before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of

the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of

statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion

of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or

without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial

court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and

proceed against her in accordance with law.

9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court

concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith.

Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice

Preeti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter