Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahadev vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 1532 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1532 Chatt
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2026

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Mahadev vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 10 April, 2026

                                                           1




           Digitally
RAGHVENDRA signed by
                                                                         2026:CGHC:16585
JAT        RAGHVENDRA
           JAT




                                                                                     NAFR


                                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                                 WPC No. 1660 of 2026

                        1 - Mahadev S/o. Laxmikant Aged About 45 Years R/o. Village-

                        Fundurdihari, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tehsil- Ambikapur District

                        Surguja Chhattisgarh, Permanent R/o.- Village Jharna Aaur, District-

                        Bardhaman West Bengal.

                        2 - Jayadev S/o. Late Ganesh Aged About 32 Years R/o. Village-

                        Fundurdihar, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tehsil- Ambikapur District

                        Surguja Chhattisgarh, Permanent R/o.- Village Jharna Aaur, District-

                        Bardhaman West Bengal.

                        3 - Vasudev S/o. Late. Ganesh Aged About 26 Years R/o. Village-

                        Fundurdihar, Police Station Gandhinagar, Tehsil- Ambikapur District

                        Surguja Chhattisgarh, Permanent R/o.- Village Jharna Aaur, District-

                        Bardhaman West Bengal.

                                                                          ... Petitioner(s)

                                                         versus

                        1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue

                        And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava

                        Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.).
                                      2

2 - The Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja

(C.G.).

3 - The Collector Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.).

4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (R) Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.).

5 - Tehsildar Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.).

6 - Dupety Registrar Ambikapur Ambikapur, Distt.- Surguja (C.G.).

7 - Ashish Agrawal S/o. Satyanarayan Agrawal Aged About 36 Years

R/o. Kundla City Agrasen Ward, Ambikapur, Police Station And Tahsil

Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

                                                        ... Respondent(s)

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. S. S. Choubey, G.A.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board 10/04/2026

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following

reliefs:-

"a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing

Respondent No. 3 Collector, Surguja, to decide the

petitioner's application for grant of permission to sell

rehabilitation land under Section 165(7-B) of the

Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, dated 09.02.2022,

which is pending since four years, within a stipulated

time frame, preferably within an outer limit of 15 days;

b) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon'ble

Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and

circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty

bound shall ever pray."

2. Brief facts of the case, is that, the present writ petition has been

filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction to the Collector,

Surguja (Respondent No. 3), to decide the petitioners' pending

application dated 09.02.2022, which was submitted for grant of

permission to sell rehabilitation land under Section 165(7-B) of the

Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code. The petitioners are recorded

co-owners and are in lawful possession of the rehabilitation land

situated at Village Fundurdihari, Tehsil Ambikapur, District

Surguja, which was originally allotted to their predecessors by the

Rehabilitation Department, Government of India. Owing to

financial exigencies, including medical requirements and the need

for house repairs, the petitioners entered into an agreement to sell

a portion of the said land to a private respondent after receiving

part consideration, subject to obtaining requisite permission from

the competent authority. In furtherance thereof, the petitioners

duly preferred an application before the Collector on 09.02.2022,

which was processed in accordance with law, and consequential

revenue proceedings were initiated before the Tehsildar. It is

submitted that all statutory formalities, including issuance and

publication of notice, conduct of inquiry, recording of statements,

and submission of reports by the concerned authorities, were duly

completed during the period 2022-2023; no objections were

received from any quarter, and the reports submitted were

favourable to the petitioners. However, despite completion of the

entire process and repeated representations, the Collector has

failed to decide the said application for more than four years,

thereby causing grave financial hardship and prejudice to the

petitioners. Such inaction on the part of the respondent authority

is arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of

the Constitution of India. The petitioners, having no other

efficacious alternative remedy, have approached this Hon'ble

Court seeking expeditious disposal of their application within a

fixed and reasonable time frame. Hence, this petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners

had preferred an application under Section 165(7-B) of the

Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code seeking permission to sell their

land, which was duly filed on 09.02.2022; however, despite the

lapse of a considerable period, the said application has not yet

been adjudicated by the concerned Collector, Ambikapur, District

Surguja. It is further contended that, in view of such inaction, the

present petition has been instituted seeking a direction to the said

authority to decide the application within a stipulated and

reasonable timeframe. From the averments made in the petition,

duly supported by an affidavit, as well as from the perusal of the

order sheet, it appears that the proceedings were initiated on

22.02.2022; however, even after the passage of more than three

years, no final order has been passed. It is also submitted that the

concerned Tahsildar, acting upon the instructions of the Collector,

had already submitted a report on 25.05.2022, yet the matter

continues to remain pending without any decision to date.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State

opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioners

and contends that the relief sought is misconceived, untenable in

law, and devoid of merit, and therefore does not warrant any

interference by this Hon'ble Court.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

6. It is indeed surprising that, instead of adjudicating the application,

the same has been kept pending without any plausible or

justifiable reason; accordingly, considering the facts and

circumstances of the case, the concerned Collector, Ambikapur,

District Surguja, is hereby directed to consider and decide the said

application strictly in accordance with law within a period of 30

days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and the

Collector shall further ensure that a compliance report in this

regard is duly forwarded to the Registrar General of this Hon'ble

Court within the stipulated period.

7. If any application is filed before the concerned Collector, it is

incumbent upon the said authority to consider and decide the

same in accordance with law within a reasonable period of time;

the Collector cannot be permitted to keep such application

pending indefinitely or for an unduly prolonged duration without

any justifiable cause.

8. With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed

of.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

Raghu Jat

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter