Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pyarelal Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 2255 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2255 Chatt
Judgement Date : 4 March, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Pyarelal Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 4 March, 2025

                                                        1




        Digitally
        signed by
                                                                       2025:CGHC:10526
        RAVI
RAVI    SHANKAR
SHANKAR MANDAVI
MANDAVI Date:
        2025.03.10
        18:44:24
        +0530




                                                                                   NAFR

                               HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                            WPS No. 1582 of 2025

                     1 - Pyarelal Sahu S/o Lt. Kishun Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o H. No.
                     99/2, Gurughasidas Para, Jhajhpuri Kalan, Mungeli, Distt - Mungeli
                     (C.G.)
                                                                               ... Petitioner
                                                    versus


                     1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works
                     Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur,
                     Distt- Raipur (C.G)

                     2 - Engineer-In-Chief Public Work Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Naya
                     Raipur, Distt- Raipur (C.G)

                     3 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department, Bilaspur Zone, Distt-
                     Bilaspur (C.G)

                     4 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department, Division Mungeli, Distt-
                     Mungeli (C.G)

                     5 - Divisional Joint Director Fund Account And Pension, Bilaspur
                     Division, Distt- Bilaspur (C.G)
                                                                    ... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Ankita Shukla, Advocate For State/Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Additional AG

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

04/03/2025

1. Heard Ms. Ankita Shukla, learned counsel petitioner as well as

Mr. Vivek Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General for the

State/respondent/s.

2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following

reliefs:

"10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by directing the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner for grant of leave encashment and appropriate orders be passed for releasing of leave encashment along with interest, in the interest of Justice.

10.2 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was

appointed on the post of Gang Shramik Akashual and due to

superannuation he was retired, he has been given other retrial

dues except amount of leave encashment. After appointment of

the petitioner he working his duty with utmost honesty, sincerity

and to the satisfaction of his superiors. They were never

communicated any adverse remarks in his entire service period.

The petitioner is fully eligible and legally entitled to get the benefit

of amount of leave encashment, but due to inaction on the part of

the respondent authority, he was deprived from getting said

benefit. As the petitioner is also entitled for grant of Leave

Encashment but till date benefit of leave encashment has not

been extended to the petitioner. He submits that in the light of

judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of

2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh &

Ors.) and other connected matters decided on 30.09.2022, the

petitioner is entitled for leave encashment.

4. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not

been filed by the petitioner and it is also not reflected as to

whether the petitioner has completed the minimum period of

service to avail the benefit of leave encashment.

5. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the

documents available in record.

6. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make

detailed representation before the concerned

respondent/competent authority within the period of '30 days'

from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary

documents to substantiate his claim. In the event of filing of

representation, on due verification, if the petitioner is found to be

similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel

(surpa), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of

judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably

within the period of '90 days' from the date of submission of the

said representation.

7. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with aforesaid

observations and directions.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge

Ravi Mandavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter