Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 381 Chatt
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2025
1
2025:CGHC:31015
NAFR
SHOAIB
ANWAR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Digitally signed by
SHOAIB ANWAR
Date: 2025.07.07
16:22:29 +0530
CRR No. 393 of 2019
1 - Aghan Yadav S/o Dayaram Yadav Aged About 40 Years R/o Village -
Usarwahi, Police Station Rengakhar, Tahsil - Bodla, District Kabirdham
Chhattisgarh. (Accused), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s)
versus
1 - Ashok Bhardwaj S/o Late B.D. Bhardwaj, Prop. Laxmi Tractors
Minimata Chowk, Bilaspur Road Kawardha, Present Address - Tahsil
And Police Station Balrampur District Ambikapur Chhattisgarh.
(Complainant ), District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s)
(Cause title taken from CIS)
For Petitioner(s) : Shri Bhupendra Shriwas, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Ajit Singh For Respondent(s) : None
Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 07.07.2025
1. Heard.
2. This criminal revision is preferred against the judgment and order of
conviction dated 06.03.2019 (Annexure A/1) passed by the learned
Additional Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.), Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham
(C.G.) in criminal appeal No. 14/2018, whereby, affirming the
judgment and order of conviction dated 06.02.2018 (Annexure A/2)
passed in Criminal Case No. 451/2009 by the Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Kawardha Distt. Kabirdham (C.G.) whereby the sole
applicant has been convicted and sentenced for the offence
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1988
and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for 09 months and fine amount
of Rs. 10,000/- and in default of payment of fine amount additional
simple imprisonment for 3 months.
3. From the order sheet dated 11.01.2024, it is apparent that the sole
applicant has died which has been informed to this Court by the
counsel for the applicant. On the said date on the request of learned
counsel for the applicant four weeks' time was granted to take
appropriate steps in this regard. Despite lapse of more than 1 and
½ year no application has been moved by the counsel for bringing
the legal heirs of the deceased applicant.
4. In view of foregoing, this Court has no other option except to dismiss
this criminal revision as abated.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal revision is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!