Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6457 Chatt
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WA No. 500 of 2022
Ku. Saroj Sinha D/o Shri Raghunandan Prasad Aged About 52 Years R/o
C/o. C.P. Dadsena, Quarter No.75, Jawahar Nagar, Durg, District Durg,
Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of
Panchayat Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Now Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal
Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Durg, District Durg,
Chhattisgarh.
3. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Patan, District Durg,
Chhattisgarh.
4. Ku. Deepti Mahobiya Posted As Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Government
Middle School Batrel, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
5. Shivani Yadav Posted As Shiksha Karmi Grade-3, Government
Primary School Patora, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
6. C.E.O. Janpad Panchayat, Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
7. Block Education Officer Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
8. Block Education Officer Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
9. District Education Officer Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
10. Collector Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
11. Ku. Tikeshwari Gagendra D/o Late Tijau Ram Gagendra Aged About
51 Years R/o Village Mokha, Tahsil Gurur, District Balod,
Chhattisgarh.
12. Smt. Ratnabala Mahamallay W/o Sailesh Kumar Sahu Aged About 46
Years R/o Block No.15a, Street Avenue-A, Sector-6, Bhilai, District
Durg, Chhattisgarh.
13. Ku. Pramila Sakhariya D/o Beni Ram Sakhariya C/o. Block Education
Officer, Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2
14. Ku. Sadhna Choubey D/o Aditya Prasad Choubey C/o. Block
Education Officer, Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
(Cause-title taken from Case Information System)
For Appellant : Mr. Rudranath Mukharjee, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Astha Shukla, Government Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board
Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice
21.10.2022
Heard Mr. Rudranath Mukharjee, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This writ appeal is presented against an order dated 13.09.2021
passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No.1543 of 2012.
3. There is a defect in array of parties.
4. In that view of the matter, Mr. Mukharjee prays for withdrawal of this
writ appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal and other applications which
are filed along with the present appeal.
5. Ms. Astha Shukla, learned Government Advocate submits that having
regard to the array of parties in the writ petition, she can appear only for
respondent No. 1 in this appeal. She does not oppose the prayer made by
Mr. Mukharjee.
6. Accordingly, the writ appeal is disposed of with liberty as prayed for.
7. Registry will return back certified copy of the impugned order, if
prayed for by the appellant.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Arup Kumar Goswami) (Sanjay Agrawal)
Chief Justice Judge
Hem
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!