Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2122 Chatt
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No. 2265 of 2022
1. Goverdhan Ram Yadav S/o Late Shri P. R. Yadav, Aged About 63
Years Retired Head Master, R/o Village And Post Kansabel, Tahsil
Kansabel, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Gopi Sai S/o Late Shri Pacho Sai, Aged About 63 Years, Retired
Head Master, R/o Village Tangargaon, Tahsil Kansabel, District
Jashpur (Chhattisgarh),
3. Balkunwar Ram S/o Late Shri Ratho Ram, Aged About 63 Years
Retired Head Master, R/o Village And Post Kansabel, Tahsil
Kansabel, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Loknath Ram S/o Late Shri Lodgo Ram, Aged About 63 Years
Retired Head Master, R/o Village And Post Kunkuri, Tahsil Kunkuri,
District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education
Department, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur
(Chhattisgarh)
2. District Education Officer, Jashpur, District Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)
3. Block Education Officer, Block- Kansabel, District Jashpur
(Chhattisgarh)
4. Treasury Officer, Treasury, Account And Pension, Ambikapur Division
Sarguja, District Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Avinash Singh, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 04.04.2022
Heard.
1. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners are
entitled for third Time Pay Scale/Kramonnati as per the last circular
issued by the Government on 08.08.2018 (Annexure P-2) as they
have completed 30 years of service. He would further submit that the
earlier circulars to grant Kramonnati issued on 19.04.1999,
28.04.2008, 03.10.2008, 11.01.2010 and lastly on 08.08.2008
according to that since the petitioners have completed 30 years of
service, they would be entitled for third time pay-scale. He submits
that the issue involved in the present petition has already been
considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R. S. Verma
Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No. 2805/2002 by
judgment and order dated 29.08.2006). He further submits that the
petitioners may be granted liberty to make representation to consider
their case in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K. K. Roy
(2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (Supra) to which
learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.
2. Accordingly, as per the liberty sought for by the petitioners, the
petitioners are granted liberty to make representation before the
concerned authority. It is expected that the competent authority
subject to verification shall decide the representation of petitioners
as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within
a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with the
aforesaid liberty.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!