Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaliram Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2021 Latest Caselaw 1389 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1389 Chatt
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
Kaliram Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 July, 2021
                                       -1-



                                                                              NAFR
         HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                        WPS No. 3737 of 2021
1. Kaliram Sahu S/o Rajaram Sahu Aged About 71 Years R/o Village-
   Piparchhedi,    Post-   Beltukri,     P.S.-   Rajim,   District-     Gariyaband,
   Chhattisgarh,

2. Heeraram S/o Late Dukalha Ram Aged About 69 Years R/o Village And
   Post- Kirvai, P.S.- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

3. Rahipal Sahu S/o Ramdayal Sahu Aged About 71 Years R/o Village And
   Post- Kirvai, P.S.-Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

4. Kartikram Yadu S/o Tetku, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village- Lafandi, P.S.-
   Beltukri, Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

5. Ramadhar S/o Gaindu Aged About 68 Years R/o Village-Arand, Post-
   Basin, Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

6. Madho S/o Late Vishambhar Aged About 65 Years R/o Lafandi, Post-
   Beltukri, Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

7. Basant Kumar Sahu S/o Gajanand Sahu Aged About 71 Years R/o Village
   And Post- Kirvai, Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband,

8. Sarvan Verma S/o Jhumuk Verma Aged About 74 Years R/o Village-
   Parteva, Post- Devri, Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

9. Rajhari S/o Punit Aged About 68 Years R/o Sahaspur, Post- Tarrighat,
   Tahsil- Rajim, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

                                                                      ---- Petitioner
                                  Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources
   Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Engineer-In-Chief, Water Resources Department, Atal Nagar, Nawa
   Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

3. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Mahanadi Godawari
   Kachhar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh,

4. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resource Division, Gariyaband,
   ,district- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
                                        -2-


   5. The Executive Engineer, Water Resource Department, Gariyaband,
      District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

   6. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Water Resource Department, Gariyaband,
      District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

   7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Pairi Nahar, Water Resource Sub-Division No.
      2, Panduka, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh,

   8. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur, District- Raipur,
      Chhattisgarh,                                        ----Respondents

For Petitioners : Ms. Nupoor Sonkar, Advocate.

      For State                  : Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

                      Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
                               Order on Board

27/07/2021

1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has been

filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the period

during which the petitioners have rendered their services as daily

wage employee for the purpose of counting the length of service for

receiving the pensionary benefits.

2. On a query being put to the counsel for the petitioners, they were

unable to show any document with which it could be established that

the initial appointment of the petitioners was under the Work

Charged Contingency Establishment. According to the petitioners,

for the said period during which they have rendered their services,

they have already received gratuity and therefore for the purpose of

grant of pension also the said period should also be counted.

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and also

subject to verification of the facts whether the initial appointment of

the petitioners falls under the Work Charged Contingency Paid

Employees Pension Rules or not. The respondents shall take a

decision keeping in view the judgment of the Division Bench of this

Court rendered in the case of "Lakhanram Sahu and others Vs. State

of Chhattisgarh and others" WA No.281 of 2013, decided on

26.02.2015. Let an appropriate decision be taken in this regard at

the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of

receipt of the copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands

disposed of

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

J-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter