Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subodh Kumar Chakraborty (Dec.) vs Unknown
2026 Latest Caselaw 1070 Cal/2

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1070 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Subodh Kumar Chakraborty (Dec.) vs Unknown on 17 February, 2026

OD- 35
                               ORDER SHEET

                   IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                  Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction
                            ORIGINAL SIDE

                               PLA/295/2012

                        IN THE GOODS OF :
                 SUBODH KUMAR CHAKRABORTY (DEC.)


BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY

Date:17th February, 2026 Appearance:

Mr. Jayanta Kumar Dhar, Adv.

Mr. Ramesh Chandra Paul, Adv.

...for the petitioner

The Court: The original petitioner Sushil Kumar Chakraborty who

had been the husband of the petitioner no. 1/applicant no. 1 and the

father of the petitioner no. 2/applicant no. 2, in the instant application

had applied for grant of probate with regard to the devolution of movable

and immovable properties of Subodh Kumar Chakraborty who expired

on 20th January, 2012 at his permanent residence at 27, Harodhole

Lane, within the jurisdiction of Jorabagan Police Station, Calcutta -

700005. The instant petitioners/applicants had been the legal heirs and

successors of the deceased Sushil Kumar Chakraborty being the original

petitioner and on his demise were entitled to the benefits of the last Will

and Testament dated 13th August, 2001, propounded by the testator

Subodh Kumar Chakraborty, since deceased. The original petitioner,

Sushil Kumar Chakraborty was the sole executor of the last Will and

Testament dated 13th August, 2001, executed by the testator, Subodh

Kumar Chakraborty, since deceased. The present petitioners/applicants

being the legal heirs and successors and representatives of the sole

executor had been substituted subsequently.

The report of the department dated 18th November, 2025 revealed

the instant PLA/295/2012 had been treated as non-contentious cause,

Ad Valorem Court fees being adequately paid and no caveat certification

being endorsed, the prayer (e) in PLA/295/2012 be granted. Letters of

administration be, accordingly, granted in favour of the

petitioners/applicants.

PLA/295/2012 is, accordingly, disposed of.

(ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.)

DB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter