Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2286 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2025
OCD-2
APOT/97/2025
With
CS-COM /269/2024
IA NO: GA-COM/1/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Commercial Appellate Division
ORIGINAL SIDE
ROHIT SHROFF
-VS-
MIDDLETON TRUCKING SERVICES LLP AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE ARIJIT BANERJEE
The Hon'ble JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Date : 25th April, 2025.
Appearance:
Mr. Siddhartha Lahiri, Adv.
Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Adv.
Ms. Swati Chowdhury Adv.
Mr. Debraj Dutta, Adv.
...for the appellant
Mr. Anirban Ray, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Soumabho Ghose, Adv.
Mr. Soumlaya Ganguli, Adv.
Ms. Tiana Bhattacharya, Adv.
...for the respondents
The Court: This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated
March 24, 2025 whereby a Learned Judge of this Court dismissed the
appellant's application for extension of time to file written statement.
On a reading of Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and in
view of the Division Bench judgments of this Court in Sabri Properties Pvt.
Ltd. & Ors. -vs- Frostees Exports (Inda) Pvt. Ltd. reported at 2024 SCC
OnLine Cal 2530 and in A.K. Ghosh & Co. -vs- Biman Bose & Ors (AO-
COM/35/2024, CS-COM/440/2024) and the Supreme Court decision in
Kandla Export Corporation & Anr. -vs- OCI Corporation & Anr. reported at
(2018) 14 SCC 715, we have to hold that an order extending or refusing to
extend time to file written statement insofar as a commercial cause is
concerned, is not appellable.
Mr. Lahiri, learned advocate for the appellant, at this juncture prays
for leave to withdraw this appeal and pursue any other remedy that his
client may have. Such leave is granted.
APOT/97/2025 along with IA No.GA-COM/1/2025 are dismissed as
withdrawn. This will not prevent the appellant to pursue any other remedy
that may be available to him in law.
(ARIJIT BANERJEE, J.)
(OM NARAYAN RAI, J.)
kc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!