Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5113 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
Present:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA
WPA 24223 of 2024
Sanghamitra Sarkar
versus
The State of West Bengal and others
For the petitioner Mr. Sandip Ganguly
Mr. Koushik Bhattacharyya
For the State Mr. Srijan Nayak
Ms. Rituparna Maitra
Heard on 03.10.2024
Judgment on 03.10.2024
JAY SENGUPTA, J:
This is an application, inter alia, praying for release of House
Rent Allowance, current and arrears, in favour of the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as
follows. The petitioner is an approved Assistant Professor in Education
at Sarojini Naidu College for Women, Jessore Road, Kolkata. The
husband of the petitioner being an employee of private company is
2
receiving House Rent Allowance (HRA) as a separate engagement.
The Deputy Secretary, Department of Higher Education, C.S. Branch
relying on the Memorandum of the Finance Department (Audit Branch),
Government of West Bengal bearing No.5839-F(P) dated July, 09,
2012 and the Corrigendum Memorandum thereto bearing No.8012-
F(p2)/FA/O/2m/ 206/17(N.B.) dated December 27, 2018, stopped the
payment of HRA to the petitioners. A Coordinate Bench of this Court by
the judgment dated March 16, 2021 passed in WPA 1389 of 2018
(Mousumi Biswas & Ors. State of West Bengal & Ors.) has quashed
the aforementioned Memorandum of 2018. An appeal being MAT
1023 of 2021 (The State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Mita Majumder &
Ors.) against the said judgment and order of the said Coordinate Bench
is pending. But, no order of stay has been passed in the said appeal.
Relying on this judgment, relief has been granted to a similarly
circumstanced Assistant Teacher by an order dated 21.05.2024 passed
in WPA 14006 of 2024. In view of the same, the petitioner would be
entitled to full HRA along with interest on the arrears.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State denies the
allegations made in the writ petition and submits that if, at all, any relief
is granted to the petitioner, the same has to be subject to the decision
of the appeal being MAT 1023 of 2021.
It appears that the above-referred memorandum of 2018 was
quashed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. However, an appeal is
3
pending over the issue. But, no stay has been granted in the said
appeal.
Relying on the said decision, another Coordinate Bench of this
Court has granted appropriate relief in favour of similarly circumstanced
Assistant Professor.
In the present facts which are quite similar, I find no reason to
take a different view.
Therefore, the concerned respondent authorities are directed to
release the HRA, both current and arrear in favour of the petitioners,
the arrear thereof be paid to the petitioners with interest @ 6% per
annum from the date on which it became payable till the date of
payment. Such payment shall be made within a period of six weeks
from the date of communication of this order.
It is, however, made clear that the payment of HRA in terms of
this order is subject to the result of the above referred pending appeal.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
As affidavits were not called for, allegations contained in the
writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
( Jay Sengupta, J. )
63/SG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!