Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1807 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2024
1
OD - 3
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction [Income Tax]
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/79/2018
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
KOLKATA - 4, KOLKATA
VS
M/S. JCT LIMITED
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI
And
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
Date : 14th May, 2024
Appearance :
Sri Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, Adv.
..for the appellant.
Sri Akhilesh Kumar Gupta, Adv.
Smt. Akshara Shukla, Adv.
Sri Aritra Nag, Adv.
...for the respondent.
1. Heard Sri Smarajit Roy Chowdhury, learned senior standing
counsel for the appellant and Sri Akhilesh Gupta, learned
counsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal was admitted by order dated 13.6.2018 on the
following substantial question of law :
"Whether the Learned Tribunal erred in law in allowing deduction of interest on borrowed capital without first satisfying itself that the borrowed capital had been utilized for the purpose of business in accordance with Section 36(1)(iii) and Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"
3. This appeal relates to assessment years 1998-99, 2001-02,
2002-03 and 2003-04. The impugned order dated 4.12.2015
is a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, "B" Bench, Kolkata in two appeals filed by the
revenue involving the afore-noted four assessment years.
Common question of fact and law are involved.
4. In the impugned order the ITAT has followed its earlier
order passed in Income Tax Appeal No.1135/Kol/2003 for
the assessment year 1994-95 which has been affirmed by
this Court by judgment and order dated 19.12.2023 in
ITA/19/2013 (Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata - IV Vs.
JCT Limited). In the impugned order the ITAT has also
recorded finding of fact. The assessing officer has not
disputed the availability of the surplus fund of the
assessee.
5. Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly agree
that the controversy involved in the present appeal for
the aforesaid assessment years is squarely covered by
judgment and order dated 19.12.2023 in ITA/19/2013
(Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkata - IV Vs. JCT
Limited) passed by this Court and in view thereof, both
the substantial question of law deserves to be answered
against the revenue and in favour of the assessee and the
appeal deserves to be dismissed.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed. The
substantial question of law is answered in favour of the
assessee and against the revenue.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.) Sd/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!