Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7279 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2023
18.10.2023 Item No.20 Court No.6.
S. De MAT 1567 of 2023 With I.A. No. CAN/1/2023
Fhamida Khatoon (Nazam).
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Asfak Ahammed ...for the appellant.
Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahato, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Ziaul Haque, ...for the State.
A judgment and order dated July 24, 2023,
passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in the
appellant's writ petition being WPA 17095 of 2023, is
under challenge in this appeal at the instance of the
writ petitioner.
The appellant contested the Panchayat General
Elections, 2023 and lost by four votes. With the
complaint that there were several illegalities at the
time of counting of votes, the appellant approached the
learned Single Judge seeking various orders. The
learned Judge noted that the complaint before the
concerned Block Development Officer and Panchayat
Returning Officer was lodged only on July 15, 2023,
long after the counting process was over. Accordingly,
the learned Judge refused to grant relief to the
appellant leaving it open for the appellant to approach
the appropriate forum by way of election petition in
accordance with law, for redressal of her grievance, if
so advised.
Being aggrieved, the writ petitioner has come up
by way of this present appeal.
Learned advocate for the appellant referred to an
order dated July 21, 2023 passed by the same learned
Judge in WPA 17013 of 2023 (Kursed Hossain & Anr.
Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.). He said that in
that matter also complaint was lodged by a candidate
on July 15, 2023, in respect of the same election. The
learned Judge directed the representation of the
candidate to be considered by the competent
authority. In the present case, the learned Judge
should have passed the same direction.
We have not called upon the State to make
submission.
We are of the view that in the teeth of the
Constitutional bar to the maintainability of a writ
petition involving election disputes in Article 243-O of
the Constitution of India read with the West Bengal
Panchayat Election Act, 2003 and the 2006 Rules
framed thereunder, the learned Judge ought not to
have entertained the writ petition in the earlier case
referred to by the appellant.
We do not find any infirmity in the decision of
the learned Single Judge to dismiss the writ petition,
although we are of the view that the writ petition
should have been dismissed as not maintainable and
being barred by law and not because of late filing of
complaint.
We clarify that dismissal of this appeal will not
stand in the way of the appellant pursuing any other
remedy that she may have, in accordance with law.
The appeal being MAT 1567 of 2023 is dismissed
along with the application being I.A. No. CAN/1/2023.
There is no order as to costs.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!