Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7072 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
11 & 14
12.10.2023
MAT 1683 of 2023
KAUSHIK CAN 1 of 2023
CAN 1 of 2023
Smt. Jharna Pradhan (Maity) & Ors.
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
With
MAT 1702 of 2023
Smt. Jharna Pradhan Maity & Ors.
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya
Mr. Priyabrata Thakur
Ms. Sayani Das
Mr. Snehasis Dey
... for the appellants in both the appeals
Mr. N. C. Bihani
Ms. Papiya Banerjee Bihani
... for the DSDA
Mr. Jayanta Samanta
Mr. Manas Kumar Sadhu
... for the State
Two appeals are taken up for analogous hearing as
they are at the instance of the same appellant.
Apparently, proceedings under the provisions of
the West Bengal Public Land (Eviction of Unauthorised
Occupants) Act, 1962 were initiated as against the appellants.
Appellants filed a writ petition being WPA 27572 of 2022,
2
which was disposed of by an order dated December 14, 2022.
The appellants preferred an appeal from the order
dated December 14, 2022 being MAT 3032 of 2022, which
was disposed of by an order dated January 6, 2023.
The appellants, thereafter, approached the Writ
Court by way of WPA 18324 of 2023 challenging an order
passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer dated April 10, 2023. In
such writ petition, the learned First Court took note of the
fact that remedy by way of statutory appeal was available.
The appellants preferred an appeal from the
judgment and order dated August 1, 2023 passed in WPA
18324 of 2023 being MAT 1702 of 2023, which is one of the
appeals, being heard.
The appellants approached the Writ Court again by
way of WPA 20944 of 2023, which was disposed of by an
order dated August 25, 2023,. Challenge in the third writ
petition was with regard to non-service of the report, which
was considered by the Sub-Divisional Officer. The appellants
being aggrieved by the order dated August 25, 2023,
preferred in appeal being MAT 1683 of 2023, which is also
being heard.
During the pendency of the two appeals, an
3
authority claiming to be Appellate Authority under the
provisions of the Act of 1962 passed an order dated October
4, 2023.
In such conspectus, it would be appropriate that
appellants are granted leave to pursue their remedies with
regard to the order dated October 4, 2023, before the
appropriate forum, in accordance with law.
It is the contention of the appellants that the
order dated August 4, 2023 was passed beyond jurisdiction.
It is the contention of the respondents in the two appeals
that the appeals are not maintainable.
We are not minded to enter into the rival
contentions of the parties in view that an order dated
October 4, 2023 passed by an authority claiming to be the
Appellate Authority exercising jurisdiction under the
provisions of the Act of 1962 exists. It is for the appellants
to take steps with regard thereto. Such order is not the
subject matters of the two appeals before us.
We keep all points raised by the rival parties open
to be adjudicated by the appropriate forum, if approached and
if raised.
With the aforesaid observations, MAT 1683 of
2023 and MAT 1702 of 2023 along with all connected
application are disposed of without any order as to costs.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!