Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3624 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2023
SAT 288 of 2014
Item- CAN 1 of 2022
19-05-2023
27.
Bijoy Biswas @ Bijoy Krishna Biswas & Anr.
Ct. 8
sg Vs.
Nisha Rani Saha
Mr. Soumyadeep Biswas, Adv.
... For the Appellants
An affidavit of service filed in Court is taken on record.
We have heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of
the appellants.
On consideration of the judgments of both the courts, we
admit this second appeal on the following questions of law:
I) Whether the first appellate court has substantially
erred in allowing the appeal merely on the basis of
exhibit 2 being LR record of rights and not
considering the evidence of PW1 in which the
possession of the defendant/appellant is admitted?
II) Whether the first appellate court has substantially
erred in law in deciding the issue without
appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to
determine possession of the suit property in the light
of exhibit 1 and the evidence of PW1?
Call for records. Issue usual notices.
In spite of service, none has appeared to oppose the prayer
for injunction.
The parties are directed to maintain status quo as regards
possession, nature and character of the suit property for a period
of 12 weeks from date or until further orders whichever is earlier.
2
Since the respondent is not represented, the learned counsel
for the appellant shall communicate a copy of this order to the
respondent by speed post with acknowledgement due and shall
file an affidavit of service in the second appeal.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!