Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 687 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2023
ORDER OCD-2
APOT/58/2023
WITH
CS/183/2022
IA NO: GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
GAMMON ENGINEERS AND CONTACTORS PRIVATE LTD.
VERSUS
SRMB SRIJAN PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS.
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HARISH TANDON
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
[COMMERCIAL DIVISION]
Date : 16th March 2023.
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Advocate
Mr. Prantik Garai, Advocate
Mr. Ramanuj Roy Choudhuri, Advocate
...for the appellant
Mr. Sakya Sen, Advocate
Mr. Arnab Das, Advocate
Mr. Amritam Mondal, Advocate
Ms. Epsita Banerjee, Advocate
Mr. V. K. Chakraborty, Advocate
Mr. A. K. Yadav, Advocate
...for the petitioner
Mr. Aryak Dutta, Advocate
Ms. Nilanjana Adhya, Advocate
Mr. Dipankar Das, Advocate
...for the respondent nos. 1 and 2
The Court:- This application for condonation of delay of 32 days has
been taken out on the basis of the calculation made by Assistant
Registrar, High Court, Original Side.
We have perused the calculation of limitation by the department and
we are not agreeable with the notions perceived by the said officer without
looking into the provisions of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The
computation of limitation has been done taking into account that the
period of limitation for filing an appeal is 30 days which is opposed to
Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The moment the
appeal is filed before the Commercial Appellate Division in terms of
Section 13(1) of the said Act, the special period of limitation provided
therein is to be adhered to. The officer should be careful in giving a
certificate relating to computation of limitation in future.
Since Section 13(1) of the Act provides a period of 60 days which is
from the date of the judgment or the order for the purpose of filing an
appeal before the Commercial Appellate Division, the normal period of
limitation of 30 days is unwarranted.
After perusing the date of the judgment and the date of presentation
of the instant memorandum of appeal, we find that there is a delay of two
days. After perusing the averments made in the application and the
explanations offered for such delay, we are satisfied that the petitioner
was prevented by sufficient cause in not preferring the appeal within the
time stipulated in the said Act. The delay is hereby condoned.
The office is directed to formally register the appeal.
The application is, thus, disposed of.
A preliminary objection has been raised as to the maintainability of
the instant appeal because of the embargo having been created under
Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Learned advocate for the appellant prays for an accommodation to
work on the said preliminary objection.
In view of the above, let this matter be listed on 21st March, 2023 to
be taken up as a first matter.
(HARISH TANDON, J.)
(PRASENJIT BISWAS, J.)
kc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!