Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4435 Cal
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2023
21.07.2023 Sl. No.9(DL) srm C.O. No. 1569 of 2023
Abdul Sattar Mondal
Versus
Jane Alam Gazi & Ors.
Ms. Soma Kanjilal ....for the Petitioner.
Mr. N.I. Khan, Mr. Amlan Kumar Mukherjee ...for the Opposite Parties.
The prayers in the revisional application have
become infructuous in view of the subsequent
dispossession of the petitioner from the suit property. The
Court finds the prayer of the learned Advocate for the
petitioner to be rather surprising.
It is submitted the certified copy of the judgment
and final decree passed in Title Suit No.61 of 1992 has not
yet been supplied to the petitioner. As a result of which,
the petitioner is unable to prefer an appeal.
The revisional application is disposed. The learned
Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baruipur, South 24-Parganas,
shall ensure that certified copy of the judgment and final
decree passed in Title Suit No.61 of 1992 is supplied to the
petitioner and/or the learned Advocate for the petitioner,
within a period of two weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
The other prayers with regard to the user of the
property by the persons who have taken possession upon
execution of the final decree cannot be passed in this
proceeding.
The petitioner is at liberty to approach the
appropriate forum, in accordance with law and make
similar prayers.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of
this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!