Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Khagaul Loco Labour'S ... vs Union Of India & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 4273 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4273 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
M/S. Khagaul Loco Labour'S ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 July, 2023
S/L 15
17.7.2023
Court No.26
SD
                                   WPA 8118 of 2016

              M/s. Khagaul Loco Labour's Co-operative Society Limited & Anr.
                                            Vs.
                                   Union of India & Ors.


              Mr. Phatick Chandra Das
                                                       ... for the Petitioners.
              Mrs. Aparna Banerjee
                                                     ... for the Respondents.

Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

The claim of the petitioners in this writ petition is that

penalties have been imposed upon the petitioners for the

work carried out in violation of the specific terms and

conditions of the agreement between the parties dated

December 19, 2011.

Mrs. Aparna Banerjee, counsel appearing on behalf of

the respondents, has pointed out paragraph 14 in the

agreement that allows the respondents to impose penalty in

certain events. She has further pointed out that there is an

arbitration clause in the agreement at paragraph 22.

However, on perusal of the said clause, it appears that

the clause provides the power to the General Manager to

appoint an Arbitrator. In light of the judgment in TRF Ltd.

vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. reported in

(2017) 8 SCC 377 and in Perkins Eastman Architects

DPC and Ors. vs. HSCC (India) Ltd. reported in

(2020) 20 SCC 760, such unilateral appointment cannot

be sustained now.

The petitioners are accordingly given liberty to file a

Section 11 application for appointment of an Arbitrator in

this matter allowing the exclusion of time under Article 14 of

the Limitation Act for the period in which the writ petition

was filed and was kept pending by this Court.

I make it clear that I have not entered into the merits

of the case.

With these observations, WPA 8118 of 2016 is

disposed of.

There will be no order as to costs.

All parties are to act on the website copy of this order.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter