Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4273 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023
S/L 15
17.7.2023
Court No.26
SD
WPA 8118 of 2016
M/s. Khagaul Loco Labour's Co-operative Society Limited & Anr.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Phatick Chandra Das
... for the Petitioners.
Mrs. Aparna Banerjee
... for the Respondents.
Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
The claim of the petitioners in this writ petition is that
penalties have been imposed upon the petitioners for the
work carried out in violation of the specific terms and
conditions of the agreement between the parties dated
December 19, 2011.
Mrs. Aparna Banerjee, counsel appearing on behalf of
the respondents, has pointed out paragraph 14 in the
agreement that allows the respondents to impose penalty in
certain events. She has further pointed out that there is an
arbitration clause in the agreement at paragraph 22.
However, on perusal of the said clause, it appears that
the clause provides the power to the General Manager to
appoint an Arbitrator. In light of the judgment in TRF Ltd.
vs. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. reported in
(2017) 8 SCC 377 and in Perkins Eastman Architects
DPC and Ors. vs. HSCC (India) Ltd. reported in
(2020) 20 SCC 760, such unilateral appointment cannot
be sustained now.
The petitioners are accordingly given liberty to file a
Section 11 application for appointment of an Arbitrator in
this matter allowing the exclusion of time under Article 14 of
the Limitation Act for the period in which the writ petition
was filed and was kept pending by this Court.
I make it clear that I have not entered into the merits
of the case.
With these observations, WPA 8118 of 2016 is
disposed of.
There will be no order as to costs.
All parties are to act on the website copy of this order.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!