Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 492 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023
01 17.01.2023
an Court No. 33
CRM 2848 of 2019
with
I.A. No. CRAN 1 of 2020 (Old No.: CRAN 3055 of 2020)
In the matter of: Niloy Ghosh
... petitioner
Mr. Sandip Kumar Bhattacharya
Mr. D. D. Banerjee
............. for the petitioner
Mr. Sagar Saha
............. For the N.C.B.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the
pendency of the trial, one Kamlesh Baste alias Kamlesh Panditra
Baste has been released on bail on 09.01.2023 in CRM (NDPS)
1458/2022.
It is submitted that the evidence of the parties has been
closed. The prosecution has not examined the witnesses in whose
presence the alleged seizure had taken place. Two witnesses
mentioned in the Panchnama at the time of seizure have also not been
produced by the prosecution. It is thus submitted that a prima facie
strong case has been made out by the petitioner for release of the
petitioner on bail. Moreover, PW 5 has failed to identify the petitioner
who led the investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that these factors would strongly suggest the innocence of the
petitioner and the prayer for bail may be considered.
In the order granting bail in favour of Kamlesh (Supra), the
Division Bench found that the narcotics recovered from the
possession of Kamlesh was not of commercial quantity and a vital
witness who was examined to prove the involvement of the petitioner
2
in the conspiracy and financing of inter trafficking of narcotics did not
support the case of the prosecution. These two factors had weighed
with the Division Bench in granting bail.
In the instant case, the prosecution alleged that the narcotic
substance was recovered from the petitioner and is of commercial
quantity. It also appears that the Learned Trial Court has fixed
30.01.2023
for recording statement under Section 313(Criminal
Procedure Code).
Under such circumstances, we do not wish to grant bail as
we believe that after recording of the statement under Section 313,
the Learned Trial Court would dispose of the trial within a reasonable
time.
On such consideration, we dispose of this application by
conforming the existing arrangement of the petitioner being permitted
to meet his mother twice in a week till the pronouncement of the
judgment on the same terms and conditions as we have indicated
earlier.
We also direct the learned Sessions Judge, 6 th Court,
Barasat, North 24 Parganas to dispose of the case within a period of
three months from 30.01.2023. We make it clear that the Learned
Trial Court is not to grant any adjournment to either of the parties
unless there are unavoidable circumstances. In the event, if the
matter is not disposed of within the aforesaid time period and the
petitioner is not responsible for the delay, the petitioner may renew
its prayer for bail.
The instant application stands disposed of. Consequently,
the connected application also stands disposed of.
Supplementary affidavit filed is taken on record. The report
filed by the NCB be also kept with the record.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!