Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 268 Cal
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2023
10.1.2023
211
Ct. no. 652
sb
C.O. 1961 of 2022
Smt. Moumita Sil nee Das
Vs.
Sri Subhayan Sil
Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury
...for the petitioner
Mr. Samiran Giri
Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharya
Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharya
....for the opposite party
This is an application under Section 24 of the Civil
Procedure Code seeking transfer of the Matrimonial suit
being no. 1077 of 2022 presently pending before the
court of learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court,
Alipore, South 24 parganas to the court of learned
Additional District Judge, Serampore, Hooghly.
The petitioner contended that the petitioner was
married with the opposite party according to Hindu Rites
and customs on 24.2.2012 and she alleged that after
marriage she was subjected to physical and mental
cruelty by her husband and her in laws for further
demand of dowry. They are blessed with a female child
who was born on 28.10.2013 who is presently in the
custody of the petitioner and pursuing her studies at
school. The petitioner further alleged that since she was
subjected to physical and mental cruelty by her husband
2
and her in laws, she lodged a criminal case being
Bansdroni Police Station case no. 116 of 2019 on
21.7.2019
. The petitioner submits that she is an
unemployed lady and she has no independent source of
income. She states her husband has not paid
maintenance to her or to her child for which, the
petitioner filed a case seeking maintenance under
Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for herself
and minor child in the court of learned Judicial
Magistrate, 2nd court at Serampore. The petitioner has
also filed a case under the provision of Protection of
Women from Domestic Violence Act, before same 2nd
court, at Serampore.
All of a sudden as counter blast the opposite
party/husband filed aforesaid suit for dissolution of
marriage against the present petitioner which is pending
before the court of learned Additional District Judge, 17th
Court, Alipore. The petitioner contended that she is a
patient of Renal failure and she has undergone surgery
thrice and she is suffering from veritgo and doctor has
advised her not to travel by bus or train and that she is
presently the custodian of minor child and both the
proceedings initiated by the petitioner are pending before
the Serampore court and that the distance in between
the petitioner's place of residence and the court at
Alipore is about 70 kilometres. In view of all, the
petitioner is facing lot of inconveniences and hardship in
attending said case at Alipur and for which she has
sought for aforesaid transfer.
The opposite party raised strong objection
contending that he was subjected to threat by the
petitioner herein while he attended the court at
Serampore in connection with other case and for which
he lodged complain and that if the court at all consider
the prayer for transfer made by the petitioner, it may be
transferred to the court at Howrah which will be
convenient for both the parties to attend. In reply,
learned counsel for the petitioner raised objection and
contended that due to her ailments, Howrah court will
not be convenient for the petitioner and petitioner also
denied allegation of threatening opposite party. In this
context, he relied upon a judgment reported in AIR 2020
SC 4548 and contended that for transfer, the
convenience of the wife must be given preference by the
court.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and that the
petitioner is suffering from various ailments and that she
is custodian of a minor child and that two other
proceedings initiated by the petitioner are pending before
the Serampore court, where the opposite party would be
required to attend and also considering the distance
factor, and that in such cases where the husband has
filed suit for dissolution of marriage, the convenience of
wife would be of paramount importance and that
inconvenience caused to a woman in travelling to
another place with child, specially when she is suffering
from ailments, for pursuing a matrimonial case is much
more than the inconvenience caused to husband, the
prayer for transfer made by the petitioner is allowed.
The learned District Judge, South 24 parganas at
Alipore is hereby directed to withdraw the matrimonial
suit no. 1077 of 2022 presently pending before the court
of learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court, Alipore,
South 24 parganas and to transmit the same to the
court of learned District Judge, Hooghly at Chinsurah
within a period of three weeks from the date of the
communication of the order who in turn will transfer the
same to the learned District Judge at Serampore,
Hooghly having jurisdiction within a period of three
weeks thereafter.
The transferee court shall issue fresh notice to
both the parties intimating the next date of hearing
before taking up further proceeding of the suit.
The department is directed to send a copy to the
court of learned District Judge, South 24 parganas,
Alipore and also to the learned District Judge, Hooghly
at Chinsurah.
Accordingly, C.O. 1961 of 2022 is disposed of.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly
applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all
requisite formalities.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!