Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 954 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2023
3. 2.2022
Ct. no. 652 sb C.O. 1150 of 2019
Binoy Kumar Biswas Vs.
Sufal Chandra Biswas & ors.
Mr. Surya Prasad Chattopadhyay Mr. Arjun Samanta Mr. Ankit Chatterjee ...for the Petitioner
Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal Ms. Poulami Chakraborty ...for the opposite parties
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order no.
85 dated 4.1.2019 in connection with Title Suit no. 217 of
1995, the present revisional application under Article 227
of the Constitution of India has been preferred.
The defendant/petitioner herein contended that
they have purchased a portion of the suit property from a
co-sharer and they wanted to incorporate said fact by way
of filing additional written statement and also prayed for
framing additional issue. By the impugned order, the
learned court below rejected both the prayers i.e.
acceptance of additional written statement as well as the
prayer for framing additional issue. Being aggrieved by
that order, the defendant/petitioner has preferred this
revisional application.
However, during pendency of this revisional
application, the said suit being Title Suit no. 217 of 1995
has been decreed in favour of the plaintiff. It is submitted
that being aggrieved by the said decree, the
defendant/petitioner has preferred appeal before the First
appellate court which is pending.
In view of the aforesaid judgment and decree
passed in Title suit no. 217 of 1995, the present
revisional application has become infructuous.
Let C.O. 1150 of 2019 be dismissed as being
infructuous.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!