Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 409 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023
OD-3
ORDER SHEET
CC/71/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction (Contempt)
ORIGINAL SIDE
VIJAY KUMAR BERLIA
VERSUS
PARIMAL VIBHASH MEHTA AND ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Date : 10th February, 2023 Appearance:
Mr. Sagar Bandopadhyay, Adv.
Mr. Lalit Baid, Adv.
Mr. Tamoghna Saha, Adv.
..for the petitioner
Mr. S. E. Huda, Adv.
..for the alleged contemnors
The Court: The petitioner is the defendant no.3 in the suit filed by
the plaintiffs being CS/12/2009.
The petitioner, through learned counsel, says that the defendant
no.15 (the Directors of the defendant no. 15 Company) and its various office
bearers have flouted a judgment and order passed by this Court on 4th
October, 2021. The alleged non-compliance relates to a direction passed by
the Court of a fresh valuation to be undertaken of the land which is sold to a
third party through an accredited Valuer based in Maharashtra.
The directors of the defendant no.15 Company are the alleged
contemnors. The defendant no. 15 was directed to appoint an independent
Valuer for the purpose of conducting a fresh valuation of the Thane
property.
Learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnors submits
that the alleged contemnor no.3 retired before the judgment dated 4th
October, 2021. Counsel submits that there has been no violation of the
directions given by the Court by the judgment in contempt.
Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed by the alleged contemnors within
three weeks from today; reply thereto, if any, may be filed within two weeks
thereafter. List this matter after five weeks.
(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.)
sg.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!