Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Chanchala Nandi vs United India Insurance Company ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1235 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1235 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Smt. Chanchala Nandi vs United India Insurance Company ... on 17 February, 2023
    14
17.02.2023
Ct. No.237
    pg.
                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURICTION
                                APPELLATE SIDE

                              FMA 860 of 2012
                                     with
                   IA No. CAN 3 of 2015 (CAN 4586 of 2015)

                              Smt. Chanchala Nandi
                                       Vs.
                  United India Insurance Company Limited Ors.



                    Mr. Nini Gopal Chakraborty
                          ... For the appellant/claimant

                    Mr. Rajesh Singh
                         ... For the respondent no.1/Insurance Co.


                    This appeal is directed against the judgment and

             award dated 22nd May, 2009 passed by the learned Judge,

             Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 1st Court, Purulia, in

             connection with MAC Case No.7 of 2008 whereby the

             learned Tribunal awarded compensation to the tune of

             Rs.89,500/- along with interest @ 6% per annum under

             Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act.


                    The claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor

             Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by the legal heirs of the

             deceased Gobardhan Nandi, who died in a motor accident

             which took place on 5th October, 2007 at about 2.00 p.m.

             while Gobardhan Nandi was proceeding to his native

             village Sanka by riding a       by-cycle   through Anara-

             Raghunathpur pitch road and at that time one Tata Indica

             car, bearing registration no.WB-56B/5848, coming with

             very high speed from Anara side dashed the deceased from
                        2




behind. As a result, said Gobardhan Nandi sustained

severe injury on his person. He was immediately taken to

R.N.   Pur   S.D.    Hospital,      then    shifted   to   Bankura

Sammelani Medical College and Hospital and finally

referred to N.R.S. Medical College and Hospital and

admitted there from 6th October, 2007 to 11th October,

2007 when he succumbed to his injuries.


       United       India       Insurance    Company         Limited

contested the case by filing written objection denying all

material averments of the claim petition contending, inter

alia, that vehicle violated the policy conditions having no

valid permit for which the Insurance Company is not liable

to pay any compensation.


       To prove the case, widow of the deceased examined

herself as PW-1 who corroborated the entire contents of

the claim petition and claimed compensation to the tune of

Rs.2,73,500/-. In course of her evidence, certified copy of

First Information Report, charge sheet, seizure list, post-

mortem report and insurance policy were admitted in

evidence and marked as exhibits.


       After considering the entire evidence on record, the

learned Tribunal awarded compensation to the tune of

Rs.89,500/- along with interest @ 6% per annum under

Section 171 of the Motor Vehicles Act.


       In    course        of   argument,     Mr.     Nani    Gopal

Chakraborty,    learned         advocate,   on   behalf      of   the

appellant/claimant has submitted that notional income
                        3




was assessed at Rs.15,000/- per annum by the learned

Tribunal in lieu of Rs.3,000/- per month and accordingly,

he prays for modification of the compensation.

       Mr. Rajesh Singh, learned advocate, on behalf of

the respondent no.1/Insurance Company has submitted

that the claim case arose out of an application under

Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and,

therefore, the income of the deceased cannot be assessed

more than Rs.15,000/- per annum as per Second

Schedule of the Act.

       Considering the entire facts and circumstances of

this case as well as the nature of legislation, I am of the

humble opinion that the income of the deceased should be

considered as Rs.2,500/- per month to compute the

compensation after applying multiplier 8 in terms of age of

the deceased as it appears from the post-mortem report in

absence of any cogent document. Accordingly, I modify the

compensation hereunder:-


  Monthly Income                              Rs.    2,500/-

  Annual Income (Rs.2,500/- x 12)             Rs. 30,000/-

  Less: 1/3rd Deduction (personal expenses)   Rs. 10,000/-
                                              -------------------

Rs. 20,000/-

-------------------

Rs.1,60,000/-

Add: General Damages Rs. 9,500/-

-------------------

Rs.1,69,500/-

Less: Awarded by ld. Tribunal & received Rs. 89,500/-

-------------------

                       ENHANCEMENT            Rs. 80,000/-
                                              -------------------





        For    the    reasons,   it   is   seen    that    the

appellant/claimant is entitled to the total compensation to

the tune of Rs.1,69,500/-. It is reported that the

appellant/claimant has already received Rs.89,500/- as

awarded by the learned Tribunal.

Therefore, the appellant/claimant is entitled to the

balance compensation amount of Rs.80,000/- along with

interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the

claim petition, i.e., on 21st January, 2008 till the deposit of

the amount.

Accordingly, the respondent no.1/United India

Insurance Company Limited is directed to deposit the

enhanced compensation amount of Rs.80,000/- along with

interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the

claim petition, i.e., on 21st January, 2008 till the actual

deposit of the amount before the office of the learned

Registrar General of this Court, within six weeks from the

date of this order.

The appellant/claimant is entitled to withdraw the

balance compensation amount with interest.

The learned Registrar General is requested to

disburse the amount with interest to the appellant/

claimant on proper identification and proof.

With the above observations, the appeal, being

FMA 860 of 2012, is disposed of.

All pending applications, if there be any, stand

disposed of.

Records of the learned Tribunal along with a copy

of this order be transmitted back immediately.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of

necessary formalities.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter