Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1101 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2023
01 09.02.2023
NB Ct. 39 WPA 9932 of 2012
Alpana Halder
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Mir Anowar.
...for the petitioner.
Mr. Prasanta Behari Mahata,
Ms. Reshmi Rehman.
...for the State respondents.
At the time of writing judgment, it appeared that certain
clarifications were required to be sought from the learned
counsels for the parties. That is why the matter was directed to
appear in the list today.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submits that although the vires of a particular provision of the Act
was challenged, the same has already been decided in another
writ petition. Therefore, the petitioner was not pressing for the
same.
Since the petitioner was not pressing the challenge to
the vires of certain provisions of the Act, the learned Advocate
General need not be made a party.
Heard the learned counsels for the parties.
Hearing is concluded and judgment is reserved.
Urgent photostat certified copy of the said order may be
supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!