Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5111 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2023
Form No. J.(2)
Item No.4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
HEARD ON: 17.08.2023
DELIVERED ON: 17.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
M.A.T. 1251 of 2023
With
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Shiba Prosad Banerjee
Vs.
The Union of India & Ors.
Appearance:-
Mr. Saptansu Basu
Mr. Swarup Paul
Mr. Surya Maity .........for the appellant
Mr. Ashok Kumar Chakraborty, Ld. A.S.G.
Ms. Sayani Roy Chowdhury .........for the Union of India
Mrs. Aparna Banerjee ..........for the respondent no.6
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.)
1. This intra-Court appeal filed by the writ petitioner is directed against the
order dated 3rd July, 2023 in W.P.A. 15162 of 2023. The appellant filed the
said writ petition challenging certain terms and conditions of the Notice
Inviting Tender issued by the respondent no.6. The writ petition was
dismissed by the impugned order and challenging the same, the appellant
has preferred this appeal.
2. The learned advocate appearing for the 6 th respondent based on written
instruction submits that the Notice Inviting Tender, which was issued by
the 6th respondent has been cancelled on 7th August, 2023. Copy of such
proceeding has been handed over to the learned advocate appearing for the
appellant.
3. The learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India
submitted that the challenge in the writ petition was to a corrigendum
issued by the 6th respondent with regard to a tender notification calling for
tenders for supply of food articles for cancer patients stipulating 05 years'
experience in the particular field. It is submitted that the learned single
Bench had rightly dismissed the writ petition stating that it is for the
tender inviting authority to prescribe terms and conditions and these are
all technical matters, which cannot be gone into in a writ petition.
4. It is submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant that
since the petitioner had challenged various terms and conditions of the
Notice Inviting Tender issued by the 6 th respondent and in the light of the
fact that the 6th respondent has now withdrawn the said Notice Inviting
Tender, the appellant's right should be preserved and kept open and the
observations made by the learned single Bench in the impugned order
should not stand in the way of the appellant in the event, the appellant is
desirous of challenging any of the terms and conditions of any tender
notice that may be issued by the 6 th respondent in future. It goes without
saying that since the impugned tender notice has itself been cancelled on
7th August, 2023, the challenge to the terms and conditions has become
academic. Therefore, whatever observations/findings rendered by the
learned single Bench in the impugned order will not stand in the way of the
appellant in the event the appellant is desirous of challenging any of the
terms and conditions of any tender notification that may be issued by the
6th respondent in future.
5. With the above observations/clarifications, the appeal and the connected
application stand disposed of.
6. No costs.
7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to
the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
I agree.
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Pallab/KS AR(Ct.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!