Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4871 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2023
14.
08.8.2023
S.D.
W.P.A. 15457 of 2023
Sambhunath Chatterjee
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Chanchal Kumar Dey
Mr. Diganta Sikdar
..For the Petitioner
Mr. Aryak Datta
Ms. Sabita Roy
...For the Respondent No. 1
Mr. Sukumar Bhattacharyya Mr. Arunava Ganguly
The petitioner seeks to claim the retiral benefits of his
father, who was an employee of the Indian Railways.
Mr. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the Union of India submits that since the petitioner's
father was an employee of the Indian Railways, this Court,
does not have the jurisdiction to receive, try and entertain the
writ petition, at the first instance.
Considering the submissions of the parties and the
materials placed on record, this Court is of the view that the
appropriate Tribunal under the Administrative Tribunals Act,
1985 is the Court at first instance.
A beneficial reference may be made to the Apex Court
Judgment in the case of L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India
& Ors. reported in (1997) 3 SCC 261.
Accordingly, W.P.A. 15457 of 2023 is dismissed as not
pressed.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the
merits of the writ petition.
Parties will be at liberty to take appropriate steps, if so
advised.
Since no affidavits have been directed to be exchanged
in the present writ petition, all the allegations contained in the
present petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the
parties.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Lapita Banerji, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!