Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4722 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2023
5
03.08.2023
D.Hira
Court No. 12
In The High Court At Calcutta
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
MAT 261 of 2020
With
CAN 1 of 2020 (Old No. CAN 1549 of 2020)
Anukul Dinda
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das,
Ms. Swati Mandal.
... for the appellant
The respondent nos. 8 & 9/writ petitioners
filed the writ petition being W.P. no. 24655 (W) of
2018 challenging the order of Sub-Divisional
Officer, Kakdwip dated 26th November, 2018
cancelling the schedule tribes certificate issued.
According to the respondent nos. 8 & 9 as
per the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in Kumari
Madhuri Patil's case, the issue with regard to
scheduled castes and scheduled tribes community
has to be considered only by the State Level
Scrutiny Committee, which is competent to decide
the genuineness of scheduled castes and
scheduled tribes certificate already issued and is
also competent to confirm, modify or cancel the
said certificate.
The appellant herein as private respondent
in the writ petition supported the order of Sub-
Divisional Officer before the learned Single Judge
and contended that only after thorough enquiry
and based on the report of the Director of Cultural
Research Institute, Backward Class Welfare
Department, Government of West Bengal, the Sub-
Divisional Officer cancelled the certificate.
Mr. Das, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant further submitted that the respondent
nos. 8 & 9 themselves have sought for issuance of
scheduled castes community certificate and,
therefore, order of the Sub-Divisional Officer
cancelling scheduled tribes certificate is valid and
prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.
The learned counsel appearing for the State
submitted that the Sub-Divisional Officer ought to
have been made reference to the State Level
Scrutiny Committee under Section 8A of the West
Bengal Schedule Castes and Schedule Tribes
(Identification) Act, 1994 and cancellation of the
certificate directly by the Sub-Divisional Officer is
illegal.
Learned Judge considering the judgment of
Hon'ble Apex Court in Kumari Madhuri Patil's case
and elaborately considering the provisions and
rules which contemplates the comprehensive
proceedings to be followed by the State Level
Scrutiny Committee set aside the order of the Sub-
Divisional Officer.
Learned Judge has made clear that the
order of the learned Judge in the writ petition will
not deter the Sub-Divisional Officer from rehearing
the complaint made by the appellant upon
reference to the State Level Scrutiny Committee in
accordance with law.
Learned Judge also issued direction to the
State Level Scrutiny Committee that if such
reference is made by the Sub-Divisional Officer, to
look into the matter in accordance with law and
with regard to the social status of the respondent
nos. 8 & 9 and take necessary steps.
Against the said order the private
respondents in the writ petition has come out with
the present appeal.
Mr. Das, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant reiterated the averments made in the
grounds of appeal and also extensively referred to
the documents filed along with the stay petition
and submitted that the Sub-Divisional Officer
cancelled the certificate of the respondent nos. 8 &
9 only after due enquiry.
Mr. Das, learned counsel for the appellant
made elaborate submissions that respondent nos.
8 & 9 belong to scheduled castes community and
prayed for setting aside the order of the learned
Judge and allowing the appeal.
There is no representation for the private
respondent as well as State.
Heard Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, learned
counsel appearing for the appellant and perused
the materials on record.
From the materials on record it is seen that
scheduled castes community certificate was issued
to the respondent nos. 8 & 9 was cancelled by the
Sub-Divisional Officer.
It is now well settled that the State Level
Scrutiny Committee is the authority to cancel the
community certificate. Elaborate procedure has
been contemplated while deciding the genuineness
of community certificate issued. The committee
has power to cancel the certificate after following
the procedure.
In the present case, based on the complaint
given by the appellant, the Sub-Divisional Officer
relying on the report of Director of Cultural
Research Institute, Backward Class Welfare
Department, Government of West Bengal,
cancelled the community certificate issued to the
respondent nos. 8 & 9. The Sub-Divisional Officer
has no power to cancel the community certificate
issued.
In view of the settled judicial
pronouncements the learned Judge has rightly set
aside the order of Sub-Divisional Officer and given
liberty to the Sub-Divisional Officer to rehear the
complaint made by the appellant and made a
reference to the State Level Scrutiny Committee in
accordance with law.
Learned Judge also has issued a direction to
the State Level Scrutiny Committee to look into the
matter in accordance with law and with regard to
the social status of the respondent nos. 8 & 9.
In view of such findings, there is no error in
the order of the learned Judge warranting
interference by this Court.
The appeal fails and dismissed.
All pending applications, if any, are
consequently dismissed.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order,
if applied for, be given to the parties on usual
undertaking.
(V.M. Velumani, J.)
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!