Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

(Ad) Nasreen Shazda vs State Of West Bengal & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 4608 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4608 Cal
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
(Ad) Nasreen Shazda vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 1 August, 2023
DL-29 wt30
                                MAT 85 of 2021
01.08.2023                      CAN 1 of 2021
Court No.8
(AD)                           Nasreen Shazda
                                     Vs.
                         State of West Bengal & Ors.

                                    With
                                MAT 86 of 2021
                                CAN 1 of 2021

                                Nasreen Shazda
                                      Vs.
                          State of West Bengal & Ors.

                  Mr. Ekramul Bari
                  Sk. Imtiaj Uddin
                                     ... for the appellant.


                  Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, Ld. AGP
                  Mr. Somnath Naskar
                                  ... for the State-respondents.

Mr. Prasenjit Mukherjee Ms. Madhurima Sarkar ... for the Madrasah Service Commission.

Mr. Nadeem Sulaiman ... for the Madrasah Board.

Mr. Atarup Banerjee Mr. Abu Sohel Mr. Rajdeep Pramanik Ms. Sanwyabi Nandi ... for the respondent nos.7, 8 and 9.

1. By consent of the parties both the appeals and the

applications are heard together and disposed of by

this order.

2. We have informed by the learned Counsel for the

School that the entire matter has been forwarded

to the Madrasah Board for consideration. It

includes all the applications filed by the writ

petitioner with regard to child card leave and also

prayer for transfer.

3. Mr. Prosenjit Mukherjee, learned Advocate appears

for the Madrasah Commission and produces

before us a copy of an order passed in MAT 1264

of 2021 (The Headmaster/Superintendent,

Shamsia High Madrasah (HS) vs. Tarannum

Parveen & Ors.) decided on 25th January, 2022 in

which an interpretation of Rule 33 of the West

Bengal Madrasah Service Commission

Recruitment (selection and recommendation of

persons for appointment and transfer to the posts

of teacher and non-teacher) Rules, 2010

(hereinafter referred as Rule of 2010), has been

made by the Coordinate Bench:

"We have been taken to various sub-rules of

Rule 33 providing a mechanism and the mode of

considering the prayer for transfer by way of

counseling. Obviously, the Madrasah Service

Commission shall take care of any vacancy that

may arise on transfer having accepted in a

concerned Madrasah and the right, which is

accrued upon the teaching or the non-teaching staff,

cannot be whittled-down or brushed-away on

unreasonable withholding of the 'No Objection

Certificate'."

4. In view of the fact that the Board is in seisin over

the matter.

5. With regard to the child care leave of the writ

petitioner, we direct the Secretary, West Bengal

Board of Madrasah Education to take a final

decision with regard to child care leave upon

consideration of the facts and circumstances

stated by the writ petitioner and on consideration

of the relevant Rules in this regard.

6. The school and the writ petitioner are directed to

produce all relevant records before the Secretary in

order to enable to take an appropriate decision in

this regard.

7. The entire exercise shall be completed within a

period of eight weeks from the date of

communication of this order by either of the

parties.

8. We direct the Secretary of the West Bengal

Madrasah Service Commission to take a decision

with regard to the transfer after giving reasonable

opportunity of hearing to the parties including the

school within eight weeks from the date of

communication of this order.

9. It is needless to mention that the Secretary of the

Commission shall take into consideration of the

decision of the Coordinate Bench in the matter of

Tarannum Parveen & Ors. (supra) at the time of

consideration of the said representation.

10. We placed on record that an application for

transfer has already been filed by the writ

petitioner without no objection.

11. In view of the aforesaid discussions and the fact

that there is a requirement to have a fresh look

and re-look at the matter, the judgment and order

is set aside.

12. Affidavits are kept with the record.

13. Both the appeals being MAT 85 of 2021 and MAT

86 of 2021 along with all connected applications

are disposed of accordingly.

(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter